首页> 外文期刊>Computers & Fluids >On improving mass-conservation properties of the hybrid particle-level-set method
【24h】

On improving mass-conservation properties of the hybrid particle-level-set method

机译:关于改进混合粒子水平集方法的质量守恒性质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For the computation of multi-phase flows level-set methods are an attractive alternative to volume-of-fluid or front-tracking approaches. For improving their accuracy and efficiency the hybrid particle-level-set modification was proposed by Enright et al. [Enright D, Fedkiw R, Ferziger J, Mitchell I. A hybrid particle-level-set method for improved interface capturing. J Comput Phys 2002;183:83-116]. In actual applications the overall properties of a level-set method, such as mass conservation, are strongly affected by discretization schemes and algorithmic details. In this paper we address these issues with the objective of determining the optimum alternatives for the purpose of direct numerical simulation of dispersed-droplet flows. We evaluate different discretization schemes for curvature and unit normal vector at the interface. Another issue is the particular formulation of the reinitialization of the level-set function which significantly affects the quality of computational results. Different approaches employing higher-order schemes for discretization, supplemented either by a correction step using marker particles (Enright et al., 2002) or by additional constraints [Sussman M, Almgren AS, Bell JB, Colella P, Howell LH, Welcome ML. An adaptive level set approach for incompressible two-phase flows. J Comput Phys 1999;148:81-124] are analyzed. Different parameter choices for the hybrid particle-level-set method are evaluated with the purpose of increasing the efficiency of the method. Aiming at large-scale computations we find that in comparison with pure level-set methods the hybrid particle-level-set method exhibits better mass-conservation properties, especially in the case of marginally resolved interfaces.
机译:对于多相流的计算,水平集方法是流体体积或前向跟踪方法的一种有吸引力的替代方法。为了提高其准确性和效率,Enright等人提出了混合粒子级集修改。 [Enright D,Fedkiw R,Ferziger J,MitchellI。一种用于改进界面捕获的混合粒子级集方法。 J Comput Phys 2002; 183:83-116]。在实际应用中,水平集方法的整体属性(例如质量守恒)会受到离散化方案和算法细节的强烈影响。在本文中,我们解决这些问题的目的是确定最佳替代方案,以便对分散液滴流进行直接数值模拟。我们评估界面处曲率和单位法向矢量的不同离散化方案。另一个问题是重新设置水平集函数的特殊方式,这会严重影响计算结果的质量。采用高阶方案进行离散化的不同方法,可以通过使用标记粒子的校正步骤(Enright等,2002)或其他约束条件来补充[Sussman M,Almgren AS,Bell JB,Colella P,Howell LH,Welcome ML。不可压缩两相流的自适应水平集方法。 [J Comput Phys 1999; 148:81-124]进行了分析。为了提高该方法的效率,评估了混合粒子水平集方法的不同参数选择。针对大规模计算,我们发现与纯水平集方法相比,混合粒子水平集方法表现出更好的质量守恒特性,尤其是在边缘解析界面的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号