...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental allergy : >Clinical efficacy and immunological mechanisms of sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy in asthmatic/rhinitis children sensitized to house dust mite: an open randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Clinical efficacy and immunological mechanisms of sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy in asthmatic/rhinitis children sensitized to house dust mite: an open randomized controlled trial

机译:舌下和皮下免疫治疗对屋尘螨敏感的哮喘/鼻炎儿童的临床疗效和免疫机制:一项开放随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background In children, the clinical efficacy and immunological mechanisms of sublingualimmunotherapy (SLIT) compared with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is still to beelucidated.Objectives To compare SLIT, SCLT and pharmacotherapy in relation to clinical efficacy andimmunological mechanisms that govern its effect in asthmatic/rhinitis children who weresensitized to house dust mite (HDM).Methods In this single centre, prospective, randomized, controlled, open labelled, threeparallel group trial, 48 patients mono-sensitized to HDM were randomized to receive eitherSLIT (n = 16), SCIT (n= 16) or pharmacotherapy alone (n= 16). Symptom, medication andvisual analogue score (VAS) were collected and bronchial-nasal hyper-reactivity, skin pricktests, total-specific IgE were performed at baseline and 12 months after treatment. In addition,peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cultured with recombinant Der p 1 and Bet v 1extracts and allergen-specific IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IFN-y, IL-10, and TGF-(3 secretions weremeasured.Results SLIT and SCIT demonstrated a significant reduction of total rhinitis and asthmasymptom score, total medication score, VAS and skin reactivity to HDM (P<0.05) whencompared with pharmacotherapy. A significant reduction of serum-specific HDM-IgE in SCITand SLIT were observed. Moreover, titrated nasal provocative dose significantly increased inboth immunotherapy groups when compared with the pharmacotherapy group. No adverseeffects were reported in SLIT, while two patients demonstrated serious adverse events in SCIT.After 1 year of treatment, Der p 1-driven IL-10 significantly increased in SLIT compared withpharmacotherapy, whereas Bet v 1-driven TGF-P (negative control) increased significantly inSLIT only. No changes were observed for Thl-Th2 cytokines.Conclusion Both SLIT and SCIT demonstrated clinical improvement compared withpharmacotherapy in asthma/rhinitis children sensitized to HDM.
机译:背景技术在儿童中,舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)与皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)的临床疗效和免疫机制尚待阐明。目的比较SLIT,SCLT和药物疗法与控制其在哮喘/鼻炎中的疗效和免疫机制之间的关系方法:在这个单中心,前瞻性,随机,对照,开放标签,三平行小组试验中,对48名对HDM单敏的患者随机接受SLIT(n = 16),SCIT( n = 16)或单独进行药物治疗(n = 16)。收集症状,药物和视觉类似物评分(VAS),并在基线和治疗后12个月进行支气管-鼻过度反应,皮肤刺痛,总特异性IgE。此外,用重组Der p 1和Bet v 1提取物培养外周血单核细胞,并测定过敏原特异性IL-4,IL-5,IL-13,IFN-γ,IL-10和TGF-(测量了3种分泌物。结果与药物治疗相比,SLIT和SCIT显着降低了总鼻炎和哮喘症状评分,总药物评分,VAS和对HDM的皮肤反应性(P <0.05),并观察到SCIT和SLIT中血清特异性HDM-IgE显着降低。此外,与药物治疗组相比,免疫治疗组滴鼻刺激剂量明显增加,SLIT未见不良反应,而两名患者表现出严重的SCIT不良反应。治疗1年后,Der p 1驱动的IL-10显着增加。与药物治疗相比,SLIT升高,而Bet v 1驱动的TGF-P(阴性对照)仅在SLIT中显着增加,而Thl-Th2细胞因子未见变化。与药物治疗相比,对HDM敏感的哮喘/鼻炎儿童的临床治疗改善了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号