首页> 外文期刊>Computational statistics & data analysis >Mantel-Haenszel estimators of odds ratios for stratified dependent binomial data
【24h】

Mantel-Haenszel estimators of odds ratios for stratified dependent binomial data

机译:分层相关二项式数据的比值的Mantel-Haenszel估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A standard approach to analyzing n binary matched pairs usually represented in n 2×2 tables is to apply a subject-specific model; for the simplest situation it is the so-called Rasch model. An alternative population-averaged approach is to apply a marginal model to the single 2×2 table formed by n subjects. For the situation of having an additional stratification variable with K levels forming K 2×2 tables, standard fitting approaches, such as generalized estimating equations and maximum likelihood, or, alternatively, the standard Mantel-Haenszel (MH) estimator, can be applied. However, while all these standard approaches are consistent under a large-stratum limiting model, they are not consistent under a sparse-data limiting model. In this paper, we propose a new MH estimator and a variance estimator that are both dually consistent: consistent under both large-stratum and sparse-data limiting situations. In a simulation study, the properties of the proposed estimators are confirmed, and the estimator is compared with standard marginal methods. The simulation study also considers the case when the homogeneity assumption of the odds ratios does not hold, and the asymptotic limit of the proposed MH estimator under this situation is derived. The results show that the proposed MH estimator is generally better than the standard estimator, and the same can be said about the associated Wald-type confidence intervals.
机译:分析通常在n 2×2表中表示的n个二进制匹配对的标准方法是应用特定主题的模型。对于最简单的情况,它就是所谓的Rasch模型。另一种人口平均方法是将边际模型应用于由n个对象组成的单个2×2表。对于具有形成K 2×2表格的K级的附加分层变量的情况,可以使用标准拟合方法(例如广义估计方程和最大似然),或者使用标准Mantel-Haenszel(MH)估计器。但是,尽管所有这些标准方法在大层限制模型下都是一致的,但在稀疏数据限制模型下却不一致。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的MH估计器和方差估计器,它们都是双重一致的:在大数据层和稀疏数据限制情况下都是一致的。在仿真研究中,确定了拟议估计量的性质,并将估计量与标准边际方法进行了比较。仿真研究还考虑了比值比的均质性假设不成立的情况,并推导了在这种情况下拟议的MH估计量的渐近极限。结果表明,提出的MH估计量通常要比标准估计量好,并且相关联的Wald型置信区间也可以这样说。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号