首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental obstetrics and gynecology >Analysis of perioperative morbidity according to whether the uterine cavity is opened or remains closed during abdominal myomectomy--results of 423 abdominal myomectomy cases.
【24h】

Analysis of perioperative morbidity according to whether the uterine cavity is opened or remains closed during abdominal myomectomy--results of 423 abdominal myomectomy cases.

机译:根据腹部子宫肌瘤切除术中子宫腔是打开还是保持关闭状态分析围手术期发病率-423例腹部子宫肌瘤切除术病例的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For women who desire pregnancy or who wish to retain their uterus, myomectomy is the standard approach for the treatment of fibroids. Abdominal myomectomy seems to be the best choice when there are large subserosal or intramural fibroids (> 5-7 cm), or submucosal fibroids > 3 cm or when multiple fibroids (> 3) are to be removed. When submucosal myomas are present or multiple fibroids are to be removed, opening the uterine cavity during the surgical procedure is more likely to happen. There is lack of published evidence about whether there is any difference in perioperative morbidity and management of those cases where the uterine cavity is opened during the surgical procedure compared with those where the uterine cavity remains closed. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of 423 abdominal myomectomies via either an opened or closed uterine cavity. As a primary outcome we assessed the overall perioperative morbidity rate and as a secondary outcome we compared the necessity of pre and postoperative transfusions, intraoperative bleeding, febrile morbidity, unintended surgical interventions, life-threatening events, need for relaparotomies and duration of hospital stay between the opened and non opened uterine cavity groups. RESULTS: The overall perioperative morbidity rate was significantly higher in those cases where the uterine cavity was opened during surgery; however the difference was caused only by the increased risk of intraoperative bleeding. All the other variables, such as febrile morbidity, number of relaparotomies, unintended surgical procedures and life-threatening events did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although there is an increased risk of intraoperative bleeding it seems that entering the uterine cavity during abdominal myomectomy can be considered as safe a procedure as in those cases where the uterine cavity remains closed.
机译:对于希望怀孕或希望保留子宫的妇女,子宫肌瘤切除术是治疗肌瘤的标准方法。当存在大的浆膜下或壁内肌瘤(> 5-7 cm)或粘膜下肌瘤> 3 cm或要切除多个肌瘤(> 3)时,腹部肌瘤切除术似乎是最佳选择。当存在粘膜下肌瘤或要切除多个肌瘤时,在外科手术过程中更容易打开子宫腔。没有公开的证据表明,与那些保持子宫腔关闭的情况相比,在手术过程中打开子宫腔的情况在围手术期发病率和处理方面是否存在任何差异。方法:我们通过开放或封闭的子宫腔对423例腹部肌切开术进行了回顾性研究。作为主要结果,我们评估了围手术期的总体发病率,作为次要结果,我们比较了术前和术后输血,术中出血,高热发病率,意外手术干预,危及生命的事件,再次手术的必要性以及住院时间之间的必要性打开和未打开的子宫腔组。结果:在手术期间打开子宫腔的那些人,围手术期的总体发病率明显更高;然而,差异仅是由于术中出血风险增加所致。两组之间的所有其他变量,如高热发病率,开腹手术的数量,意外手术程序和危及生命的事件,均无差异。结论:尽管术中出血的风险增加,但似乎在腹腔子宫肌瘤切除术中进入子宫腔与在子宫腔保持闭合的情况下一样是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号