...
首页> 外文期刊>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis >Effect of Sample Preparation Methods on Analytical Values of Some Micro- and Secondary Nutrients in Plant Tissues.
【24h】

Effect of Sample Preparation Methods on Analytical Values of Some Micro- and Secondary Nutrients in Plant Tissues.

机译:样品制备方法对植物组织中某些微量和次级营养素分析值的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Plant tissues of rice and wheat crops (n = 5) collected at harvest time were wet-ashed in di-acid mixture [analytical-grade nitric acid (HNO3)-perchloric acid (HClO4), 3:1, v/v] on a sand bath at 200 pC or dry-ashed in a muffle furnace at 550 pC for 3 h in triplicate. The samples were analyzed for calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), and molybdenum (Mo) using double-beam atomic absorption spectrophotometry (GBC-Avanta summation model) and for boron (B) by colorimetry (UV-VIS spectrophotometer, ECIL-GS 5705 model) using Azomethine-H procedure. As per the paired t-test, both wet-ashing and dry-ashing procedures resulted in statistically similar analytical values for B, Ca, Fe, and Mo. However, the mean coefficients of variation were higher with the wet-ashing procedure (6.19 to 9.64%) as compared to the dry-ashing procedure (2.14 to 3.45%). The dry-ashing procedure was found to be the best for routine chemical analysis of B and Mo in plant samples.
机译:将收获时收集的水稻和小麦作物(n = 5)的植物组织在二酸混合物中进行灰分[分析级硝酸(HNO3)-高氯酸(HClO4),3:1,v / v]。在200 pC的沙浴中,或在550 pC的马弗炉中干灰,一式三份。使用双束原子吸收分光光度法(GBC-Avanta加和模型)分析样品中的钙(Ca),铁(Fe)和钼(Mo),并通过比色法(UV-VIS分光光度计,ECIL-C)分析样品中的硼(B)。 GS 5705型)使用Azomethine-H程序。根据配对t检验,湿灰分法和干灰分法均得出B,Ca,Fe和Mo的统计分析值相似。但是,湿灰分法的平均变异系数更高(6.19到9.64%),而干法灰分程序(2.14到3.45%)。人们发现,干灰分选法是常规分析植物样品中B和Mo的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号