...
首页> 外文期刊>Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology >Cognitive mapping in mental time travel and mental space navigation
【24h】

Cognitive mapping in mental time travel and mental space navigation

机译:心理时间旅行和心理空间导航中的认知映射

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ability to imagine ourselves in the past, in the future or in different spatial locations suggests that the brain can generate cognitive maps that are independent of the experiential self in the here and now. Using three experiments, we asked to which extent Mental Time Travel (MU; imagining the self in time) and Mental Space Navigation (MSN; imagining the self in space) shared similar cognitive operations. For this, participants judged the ordinality of real historical events in time and in space with respect to different mental perspectives: for instance, participants mentally projected themselves in Paris in nine years, and judged whether an event occurred before or after, or, east or west, of where they mentally stood. In all three experiments, symbolic distance effects in time and space dimensions were quantified using Reaction Times (RT) and Error Rates (ER). When self-projected, participants were slower and were less accurate (absolute distance effects); participants were also faster and more accurate when the spatial and temporal distances were further away from their mental viewpoint (relative distance effects). These effects show that MU and MSN require egocentric mapping and that self-projection requires map transformations. Additionally, participants' performance was affected when self-projection was made in one dimension but judgements in another, revealing a competition between temporal and spatial mapping (Experiment 2 & 3). Altogether, our findings suggest that MU and MSN are separately mapped although they require comparable allo- to ego-centric map conversion. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在过去,将来或在不同的空间位置想象自己的能力表明,大脑可以生成与此时此刻的体验式自我无关的认知图。通过三个实验,我们询问“心理时间旅行”(MU;想象自我)和“心理空间导航”(MSN;想象自我)在多大程度上共享了相似的认知操作。为此,参与者根据不同的心理观点来判断真实的历史事件在时间和空间上的普遍性:例如,参与者在九年的时间里在巴黎进行了心理投射,并判断事件是在东方发生还是在东方发生之前或之后发生。西边,是他们精神立场所在的地方。在所有三个实验中,使用反应时间(RT)和错误率(ER)量化了时间和空间维度上的符号距离影响。当进行自我预测时,参与者的速度较慢且准确性较差(绝对距离效应);当空间和时间距离距离他们的心理观点较远时(相对距离影响),参与者也更快,更准确。这些效果表明MU和MSN需要以自我为中心的映射,而自投影则需要映射转换。此外,当在一个维度上进行自我投影而在另一个维度上进行判断时,参与者的表现会受到影响,这揭示了时间和空间映射之间的竞争(实验2和3)。总体而言,我们的发现表明MU和MSN分别进行了映射,尽管它们需要类似的以自中心为中心的映射转换。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号