首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >Salary Market Equity at the University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries: A Case Study Follow-up
【24h】

Salary Market Equity at the University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries: A Case Study Follow-up

机译:科罗拉多大学博尔德图书馆的薪金市场公平:案例研究跟进

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

During the 1995-1996 academic year, the University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries received market equity funds to increase librarian salaries to the median Association University librarian salary. One stipulation of the university administration required that the market equity funds be distributed over four years rather than in a single year. In an earlier article, the authors predicted that, as result of spreading the increase over four years, salaries of libraries faculty would only reach the 1996-1997 mean in 2000-2001. This follow-up study analyzes the results of distributing the equity funds over the four years between 1995-1996 and 2000-2001. It finds that time, the University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries rose from the bottom quartile of its comparison group to the top quartile when ranked by median salary, suggesting that spreading the equity over four years did not significantly impact the final salaries. Detailed analysis, however, reveals that although the overall salary pool rose in its comparison group, many individual librarians' salaries did not reach market. This study concludes that the increase in overall ranking was due to a fundamental change in the profile of the faculty rather than to the application of market equity funds. The failure of some salaries to increase to market can likely be attributed to changes in the market rate of each position classification. Further, although the application of market equity might have been improved had the distances between the market and the librarians' salaries been recalculated each of the four years, internal and external factors may have made that impractical.
机译:在1995-1996学年期间,科罗拉多大学博尔德分校图书馆获得了市场股票基金,以将图书馆员的薪水提高到协会大学图书馆员薪水的中位数。大学管理的一项规定要求将市场股权资金分配给四年而不是一年。在较早的文章中,作者预测,由于将涨幅分散了四年,图书馆教师的薪水将仅在2000-2001年达到1996-1997年的平均水平。这项后续研究分析了1995年至1996年至2000年至2001年这四年间分配股票基金的结果。研究发现,以工资中位数进行排名时,科罗拉多大学博尔德图书馆的排名从其比较组的最低四分位数上升到了最高四分位数,这表明将股权分配到四年中不会显着影响最终薪资。然而,详细的分析显示,尽管在比较组中总体薪资总额有所增加,但许多图书馆员的薪资并未达到市场。这项研究得出的结论是,总体排名的提高是由于教师队伍的根本变化,而不是市场股票基金的应用。某些薪金未能提高到市场上的原因很可能归因于每个职位类别的市场汇率的变化。此外,尽管如果重新计算四年间每年市场与图书馆员薪水之间的距离,可能会改善市场公平性的应用,但内部和外部因素可能使这种做法不切实际。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号