首页> 外文期刊>Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology >Rational and mechanistic perspectives on reinforcement learning
【24h】

Rational and mechanistic perspectives on reinforcement learning

机译:强化学习的理性和机械观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This special issue describes important recent developments in applying reinforcement learning models to capture neural and cognitive function. But reinforcement learning, as a theoretical framework, can apply at two very different levels of description: mechanistic and rational. Reinforcement learning is often viewed in mechanistic terms - as describing the operation of aspects of an agent's cognitive and neural machinery. Yet it can also be viewed as a rational level of description, specifically, as describing a class of methods for learning from experience, using minimal background knowledge. This paper considers how rational and mechanistic perspectives differ, and what types of evidence distinguish between them. Reinforcement learning research in the cognitive and brain sciences is often implicitly committed to the mechanistic interpretation. Here the opposite view is put forward: that accounts of reinforcement learning should apply at the rational level, unless there is strong evidence for a mechanistic interpretation. Implications of this viewpoint for reinforcement-based theories in the cognitive and brain sciences are discussed.
机译:本期特刊介绍了在应用强化学习模型来捕获神经和认知功能方面的重要最新进展。但是,强化学习作为一种理论框架,可以在两个非常不同的描述层次上应用:机械的和理性的。强化学习通常用机械术语来描述-描述代理的认知和神经机制各方面的操作。然而,它也可以被视为合理的描述水平,特别是描述使用最少的背景知识从经验中学习的一类方法。本文考虑了理性的和机械的观点是如何不同的,以及哪种类型的证据可以区分它们。认知和脑科学中的强化学习研究通常隐式地致力于机械解释。在这里提出了相反的观点:除非有充分的机械解释证据,否则强化学习的说明应在理性层面上适用。讨论了这种观点对认知和脑科学中基于增补理论的启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号