...
首页> 外文期刊>Communication Methods and Measures >How Much Do We Really know About Equity's Impact on Relational Communication? Issues in Measuring Equity in Communication Research
【24h】

How Much Do We Really know About Equity's Impact on Relational Communication? Issues in Measuring Equity in Communication Research

机译:我们究竟了解多少股权对关系沟通的影响?传播研究中衡量公平的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study examined the question of whether the short global measure of equity that is typically used in communication research has fidelity to the manner in which equity was originally conceptualized. Participants were 100 pairs of college students in close relationships. They reported equity in their relationships using Hatfield's 1-item measure and also a component measure calculated with Walster et al.'s original formula for computing equity. The two measures correlated only r velence .28 (students) and .26 (partners). Correlations between these measures and other relational properties that are theoretically related (e.g., satisfaction, closeness) did not provide definitive support for either measure as being a valid measure of equity. These findings have significant implications for study of equity and relational communication, especially relational maintenance, because they cast question on how valid our measurement of equity has actually been.
机译:这项研究检验了以下问题:在传播研究中通常使用的简短的全球公平衡量标准是否对最初概念化的公平方式忠诚。参与者是100对关系密切的大学生。他们使用哈特菲尔德(Hatfield)的1个项目测度报告了他们的关系中的平等,也使用Walster等人的原始计算公式计算了分量测度。两项测度仅关联了.28(学生)和.26(合作伙伴)。这些量度与理论上相关的其他关系属性之间的相关性(例如,满意度,亲密性)并未为这两种量度提供有效的公平性量度的明确支持。这些发现对公平和关系沟通,特别是关系维护的研究具有重要意义,因为它们对我们对公平的衡量实际上有多有效提出了质疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号