Pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal oxaliplatin: experimental studies.

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Oxaliplatin is an antineoplastic platinum-based compound which has shown significant activity against advanced colon cancer. For cancers occurring within the abdominal cavity, the advantage of intraperitoneal chemotherapy is the high drug concentration that can be achieved locally with low systemic toxicity. Using a rat model, this study was designed to compare the pharmacokinetics and tissue absorption of intraperitoneal versus intravenous oxaliplatin. METHODS: In the first phase of this study, fifteen Sprague Dawley rats were given a single dose of oxaliplatin then randomized into three groups according to dose and route of delivery (5 mg/kg intravenously, 5 mg/kg intraperitoneally, or 25 mg/kg intraperitoneally). In the second phase, 10 Sprague Dawley rats were given a continuous intraperitoneal perfusion of oxaliplatin (15 mg/kg) and randomized into two groups according to the temperature of the peritoneal perfusate (normothermic vs. hyperthermic). In both phases, peritoneal fluid and blood were sampled using a standardized protocol. At the end of each procedure the animals were sacrificed. Selected tissue samples were taken in the second phase only. For all samples, platinum levels were measured by direct current (d-c) plasma emission spectroscopy. RESULTS: When oxaliplatin was delivered at 5 mg/kg the area under the curve (AUC) of the peritoneal fluid was 15-fold higher with intraperitoneal administration as compared to intravenous administration (P < 0.0001). The AUC ratio (AUC peritoneal fluid/AUC plasma) was 16 (+/- 5):1 for intraperitoneal delivery as opposed to 1:5 (+/- 2) for intravenous delivery (P = 0.0059). The AUC ratio for intraperitoneal oxaliplatin at 25 mg/kg was 17 (+/- 8):1. With the exception of the kidneys and the mesenteric nodes, tissue samples in the hyperthermic group exhibited increased oxaliplatin concentrations. These differences were not significant. For both groups colon tissues had the highest oxaliplatin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These experiments demonstrated that the exposure of peritoneal surfaces to oxaliplatin was significantly increased with intraperitoneal administration. Although the differences were not statistically significant, hyperthermia did show a trend toward the enhancement of tissue absorption of oxaliplatin. The high concentration of drug observed in colonic tissues suggests the need for clinical studies to evaluate intraperitoneal oxaliplatin for microscopic residual tumor after surgical resection of colon malignancies.