首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental hypertension: CEH >Cost-effectiveness of felodipine-metoprolol (Logimax) and enalapril in the treatment of hypertension.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of felodipine-metoprolol (Logimax) and enalapril in the treatment of hypertension.

机译:非洛地平-美托洛尔(Logimax)和依那普利在高血压治疗中的成本效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We present results from a Swedish retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of felodipine-metoprolol (Logimax) and enalapril in hypertension. In the 8-week trial, the average reduction of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and the share of patients reaching target DBP were both significantly greater in the felodipine-metoprolol group. Cost of treatment (costs of drugs and physician visits) was somewhat higher in the felodipine-metoprolol group. After 8 weeks, an extra 4.8 mmHg reduction and an additional 22% of patients reaching target DBP were achieved with felodipine-metoprolol at the extra cost of SEK 19 (Swedish kronor,
机译:我们提出了非洛地平-美托洛尔(Logimax)和依那普利在高血压中的瑞典回顾性成本-效果分析结果。在为期8周的试验中,非洛地平-美托洛尔组的平均舒张压(DBP)降低和达到目标DBP的患者比例均明显更高。非洛地平-美托洛尔组的治疗费用(药物和医师就诊费用)较高。 8周后,非洛地平-美托洛尔以瑞典克朗19的额外费用实现了4.8 mmHg的额外降低,另有22%的患者达到了目标DBP(瑞典克朗,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号