首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Treatment and local control of primary extremity soft tissue sarcomas.
【24h】

Treatment and local control of primary extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

机译:原发性四肢软组织肉瘤的治疗和局部控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Modern series of adult extremity soft tissue sarcomas utilize combinations of modalities in all patients. Remaining questions: 1) is it necessary to strive for wide margins in the multimodality era; 2) to use adjuvant therapy in every high-grade sarcoma? 3) Does previous partial or marginal resection seriously interfere with the definitive resection? METHODS: In a retrospective review of 194 extremity soft tissue sarcomas (1977-1994), limb preservation was possible in 181/194 (93%) of cases. Patients with narrow margins received adjuvant radiation. Some patients were referred after partial (n = 39) or "complete" (n = 63) excision. RESULTS: Local recurrence was observed in 181/141 (13%) of patients treated with wide or compartmental resection, and in 10 of 42 (24%) of those treated with conservative resection plus radiation (P = 0.14). The 5-year survival rate for grade III, >/=5-cm sarcomas was not significantly different (P = 0.82) with adjuvant (46%) or without (48%) adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Five-year survival varied (P = 0.0001) according to grade. Patients referred with partial, or "complete" (63%, 38/63, had residual tumor at reoperation) excision had a local recurrence rate of 8% and 6%, and 5-year survival rates of 75% and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 1) It is important to strive for wide margins even when adjuvant radiation is intended. 2) When a wide margin is possible, adjuvant radiation may not be necessary. 3) Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy may be considered for high-grade tumors, preferably within a prospective protocol. 4) A partial or "complete" excision of the tumor before referral to a tertiary center does not appear to compromise the limb preservation, local control, or survival rates of these patients. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:背景与目的:现代系列的成人四肢软组织肉瘤在所有患者中都采用了多种形式的组合。尚存的问题:1)在多式联运时代是否有必要争取更大的利润; 2)在每个高级别肉瘤中都使用辅助治疗吗? 3)先前的部分切除或边缘切除会严重干扰最终切除吗?方法:回顾性分析194例肢端软组织肉瘤(1977-1994年),在181/194(93%)的病例中可以保留肢体。边缘狭窄的患者接受了辅助放射。一些患者在部分切除(n = 39)或“完全”切除(n = 63)之后被转诊。结果:181/141(13%)的患者接受了宽或隔室切除术,而42例中的10例(24%)观察到了局部复发(P = 0.14)。在有辅助(46%)或无辅助(48%)辅助全身化疗的情况下,Ⅲ级≥5cm肉瘤的5年生存率没有显着差异(P = 0.82)。五年生存率根据年级而异(P = 0.0001)。接受部分切除或“完全切除”(63%,38/63,在再次手术时残留肿瘤)切除的患者的局部复发率分别为8%和6%,以及5年生存率分别为75%和84% 。结论:1)重要的是要努力争取更大的利润,即使打算使用辅助放射。 2)当可能有较大的余量时,可能不需要辅助辐射。 3)对于高度恶性肿瘤,最好在前瞻性方案内考虑进行辅助全身化疗。 4)在转诊至第三中心之前,部分或“完全”切除肿瘤似乎不会损害这些患者的肢体保存,局部控制或生存率。版权所有1999 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号