首页> 外文期刊>Journal of surgical education >Send IT: Study of e-mail etiquette and notions from doctors in training
【24h】

Send IT: Study of e-mail etiquette and notions from doctors in training

机译:发送信息技术:培训中的医生研究电子邮件礼节和观念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Worldwide, more than 247 billion e-mails are sent each day. Little empiric evidence is available to guide how e-mail presentation style, tone, and content affect e-mail recipients and whether these factors impact opinions about the sender and the rapidity of response. In a study of physicians in training assessing a series of 100 e-mail examples, we examined the following: (1) formatting characteristics most and least endorsed, (2) impression of the sender based on the e-mail itself, and (3) factors associated with the decision to respond. We reasoned that our study would provide empiric data to support recommendations for e-mail etiquette, focusing specifically on doctors in training. Design: Cross-sectional survey study. Setting: Division of Orthopaedic Surgery at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Participants: After each e-mail, the participating surgical residents completed a series of questions focusing on their impression of the e-mail appearance, their perception of the sender, and their motivation to respond to the e-mail. Results: Thirty-two residents participated in this study. The responses indicate that the key negatively endorsed features of the e-mails included the use of colored backgrounds (84%), difficult-to-read font (83%), lack of a subject header (55%), opening salutations without recipient names (50%), or no salutation at all (42%). The senders of negatively endorsed e-mails were perceived by participants as inefficient (p = 0.03), unprofessional (p < 0.001), and irritating (p = 0.007). E-mails with overall positive endorsements were significantly more likely to have the participants perceive the e-mail senders as professional (p < 0.001), pleasant (p = 0.048), and kind (p = 0.059). The participants were 2.6-fold more likely to respond immediately when they perceived e-mails as favorable compared with disliking them (42% vs 16% of responses, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The e-mails perceived as being disliked overall are likely to result in a negative perception of the sender and delays in response time.
机译:目标:全世界每天发送超过2470亿封电子邮件。很少有经验证据可以指导电子邮件的呈现方式,语气和内容如何影响电子邮件收件人,以及这些因素是否会影响有关发件人的意见和响应速度。在一项针对医师的培训研究中,评估了一系列100封电子邮件示例,我们检查了以下内容:(1)格式特征最多且最不支持的格式;(2)基于电子邮件本身的发件人印象;以及(3 )与做出回应的决定相关的因素。我们认为我们的研究将提供经验数据来支持有关电子邮件礼节的建议,特别是针对接受培训的医生。设计:横断面调查研究。地点:加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿的麦克马斯特大学骨外科。参与者:在收到每封电子邮件后,参与手术的住院医师完成了一系列问题,重点是他们对电子邮件外观的印象,对发件人的看法以及对电子邮件进行回复的动机。结果:32位居民参加了这项研究。答复表明,电子邮件的主要负面特征包括使用彩色背景(84%),难以阅读的字体(83%),缺少主题标头(55%),在没有收件人的情况下致敬名称(50%)或完全不打招呼(42%)。参与者认为负面认可电子邮件的发件人效率低下(p = 0.03),不专业(p <0.001)和令人讨厌(p = 0.007)。具有总体正面认可的电子邮件更有可能使参与者将电子邮件发送者视为专业(p <0.001),愉快(p = 0.048)和亲切(p = 0.059)。与不喜欢电子邮件相比,与电子邮件的参与者相比,参与者对电子邮件感到满意的立即回应的可能性要高2.6倍(分别为回应的42%和16%,p <0.001)。结论:被认为总体上不受欢迎的电子邮件可能会导致对发件人的负面看法并延迟响应时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号