首页> 外文期刊>Journal of surgical education >An ERAS-based survey evaluating demographics, United States medical licensing examination performance, and research experience between American medical graduates and United States citizen international medical graduates: Is the bar higher on the continent?
【24h】

An ERAS-based survey evaluating demographics, United States medical licensing examination performance, and research experience between American medical graduates and United States citizen international medical graduates: Is the bar higher on the continent?

机译:基于ERAS的调查,评估人口统计学,美国医学许可考试成绩以及美国医学毕业生与美国公民国际医学毕业生之间的研究经验:欧洲大陆的门槛更高吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To provide an assessment and comparison of the demographics, medical school academic performance, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) performance, and research experience between American Medical Graduate (AMG) and United States International Medical Graduate (USIMG) candidates who applied for and successfully matched into categorical general surgery residency programs. Design: Data were obtained through the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) and a post-match survey distributed to all applicants. Setting: The study was conducted at a community-based, university-affiliated hospital. Participants: All United States citizen graduates of allopathic American medical schools or international medical schools, who were applying for a general surgery residency position at our institution. Results: A total of 854 candidates applied, including 143 AMGs and 223 USIMGs. Seventy-two AMGs (50.3%) and 41 USIMGs (18.4%) were invited to interview (p < 0.0001). Mean USMLE step 1 scores were higher among USIMG applicants overall (USIMG: 212.1 ± 14.9 vs AMG: 206.9 ± 15.5; p < 0.0005) and among those invited to interview (USIMG: 227.8 ± 16.2 vs AMG: 215.5 ± 16.2; p < 0.0001). Seventy percent of AMGs matched into a categorical surgery residency compared with 31.6% of USIMGs (p < 0.001). Compared with AMGs, USIMGs applied to more programs (USIMG: 90.3 ± 42.8 vs AMG: 52.1 ± 26.4; p < 0.002), were offered fewer interviews (USIMG: 9.0 ± 6.9 vs AMG: 20.9 ± 13.7; p < 0.0001), and subsequently ranked fewer programs (USIMG: 7.5 ± 4.5 vs AMG: 12.5 ± 6.1; p < 0.0008). Conclusions: USIMGs require higher USMLE scores than their AMG counterparts to be considered for categorical general surgery residency positions. However, excellence on the USMLE neither ensures an invitation to interview nor categorical match success. A well-rounded application in conjunction with a practical application strategy is critical for USIMGs to achieve success in attaining a general surgery residency position.
机译:目的:对申请的美国医学研究生(AMG)和美国国际医学研究生(USIMG)候选人之间的人口统计学,医学院的学业表现,美国医学许可考试(USMLE)表现以及研究经验进行评估和比较并成功地与分类的普通外科住院医师计划相匹配。设计:数据是通过电子居留申请服务(ERAS)获得的,赛后调查已分发给所有申请人。地点:该研究是在一家社区大学附属医院进行的。参加者:拟在美国医院接受普通外科手术住院医师职位的同种疗法美国医学院或国际医学院的所有美国公民毕业生。结果:总共申请了854个候选人,包括143个AMG和223个USIMG。邀请了72名AMG(50.3%)和41个USIMG(18.4%)进行访谈(p <0.0001)。在USIMG申请人总体中(USIMG:212.1±14.9 vs AMG:206.9±15.5; p <0.0005)和被邀请参加面试的人(USIMG:227.8±16.2 vs AMG:215.5±16.2; p <0.0001),USMLE第一步平均得分更高)。百分之七十的AMG符合分类外科住院医师的标准,而USIMG的则为31.6%(p <0.001)。与AMG相比,USIMG适用于更多计划(USIMG:90.3±42.8 vs AMG:52.1±26.4; p <0.002),面试次数更少(USIMG:9.0±6.9 vs AMG:20.9±13.7; p <0.0001),以及随后排名较少的程序(USIMG:7.5±4.5与AMG:12.5±6.1; p <0.0008)。结论:USIMG要求比其AMG同行更高的USMLE分数,才能被认为是分类的普通外科手术住院医师职位。但是,USMLE的出色表现既不能确保邀请面试也不能确保比赛成功。全面的应用程序与实际应用程序策略相结合,对于USIMG能否成功获得普通外科住院医师职位至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号