首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes, obesity & metabolism >Twice daily biphasic insulin aspart improves postprandial glycaemic control more effectively than twice daily NPH insulin, with low risk of hypoglycaemia, in patients with type 2 diabetes.
【24h】

Twice daily biphasic insulin aspart improves postprandial glycaemic control more effectively than twice daily NPH insulin, with low risk of hypoglycaemia, in patients with type 2 diabetes.

机译:在2型糖尿病患者中,每日两次天冬胰岛素比每天两次NPH胰岛素能更有效地改善餐后血糖控制,低血糖风险低。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp30) is a dual release formulation, containing 30% soluble and 70% protamine-crystallized insulin aspart. This study compared the glycaemic control and safety profiles achieved with either twice daily BIAsp30 or NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes not optimally controlled by oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs), NPH insulin or a combination of both. METHODS: In this 16-week multinational, parallel-group, double-blind trial, 403 such patients were randomized to receive either BIAsp30 or NPH insulin immediately before breakfast and evening meals. OHAs were discontinued at randomization. Efficacy was assessed by glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and self-recorded daily 8-point blood glucose (BG) profiles. Hypoglycaemic and other adverse events were the chosen safety parameters. RESULTS: HbA1c concentration decreased by >0.6% (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline) in both groups, with metabolic control continuing to improve throughout the trial without reaching a stable level. Patients who switched from once or twice daily NPH monotherapy to twice daily BIAsp30 achieved a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (0.78%) than those randomized to twice daily NPH insulin (0.58%; p = 0.03). BIAsp30 decreased mean daily postprandial glycaemic exposure to a greater extent than NPH insulin (mean difference = 0.69 mmol/l; p < 0.0001), reflecting greater decreases in the postbreakfast and postdinner increments (of 1.26 and 1.33 mmol/l, respectively), although postlunch increment was relatively increased (by 0.56 mmol/l). Despite the greater reduction in overall postprandial glycaemic exposure in the BIAsp30 group, the overall safety profile of BIAsp30 was equivalent to that of NPH insulin with <2% of patients experiencing major hypoglycaemia, and approximately 33% reporting minor hypoglycaemic episodes, in both groups. CONCLUSION: Twice daily BIAsp30 reduced postprandial glucose exposure to a significantly greater extent than NPH insulin and was at least as effective at reducing HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. Both insulins were well tolerated. In patients poorly controlled on OHAs or NPH alone, glycaemic control can be improved by switching to twice daily BIAsp30, without increasing hypoglycaemic risk.
机译:目的:双相门冬胰岛素30(BIAsp30)是一种双重释放制剂,包含30%可溶性和70%鱼精蛋白结晶的门冬胰岛素。这项研究比较了不能通过口服降糖药(OHA),NPH胰岛素或两者的组合最佳控制的2型糖尿病患者,每日两次BIAsp30或NPH胰岛素的血糖控制和安全性。方法:在这项为期16周的跨国平行分组双盲试验中,将403名此类患者随机分配在早餐和晚餐前即刻接受BIAsp30或NPH胰岛素治疗。 OHAs随机中断。通过糖基化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和自我记录的每日8点血糖(BG)资料评估疗效。低血糖和其他不良事件是选择的安全性参数。结果:两组中HbA1c浓度均降低> 0.6%(相对于基线,p <0.0001),并且在整个试验过程中代谢控制继续改善,但未达到稳定水平。从每天一次或两次NPH单药治疗改为每天两次BIAsp30的患者,HbA1c的降低显着更大(0.78%),而随机接受每天两次NPH胰岛素的患者(0.58%; p = 0.03)。 BIAsp30降低的餐后平均每日血糖暴露程度比NPH胰岛素更大(平均差异= 0.69 mmol / l; p <0.0001),反映了早餐后和晚餐后增量的下降幅度更大(分别为1.26和1.33 mmol / l)。午餐后增量相对增加(增加了0.56 mmol / l)。尽管BIAsp30组的总体餐后血糖暴露降低幅度更大,但两组BIAsp30的总体安全性均与NPH胰岛素相当,其中两组中发生严重低血糖事件的患者少于2%,报告轻微血糖下降事件的患者约为33%。结论:每天两次BIAsp30降低餐后葡萄糖暴露的程度明显大于NPH胰岛素,并且至少在降低2型糖尿病患者的HbA1c方面同样有效。两种胰岛素均耐受良好。对于单独控制OHA或NPH效果不佳的患者,可以通过每天换两次BIAsp30来改善血糖控制,而不会增加降血糖的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号