首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >Accuracy and precision of glucose monitoring are relevant to treatment decision-making and clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with diabetes.
【24h】

Accuracy and precision of glucose monitoring are relevant to treatment decision-making and clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with diabetes.

机译:葡萄糖监测的准确性和精确度与住院糖尿病患者的治疗决策和临床结果有关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The accuracy and precision of three blood glucose meters (BGMs) were evaluated in 600 hospitalized patients with type 1 (n = 200) or type 2 (n = 400) diabetes. Capillary blood glucose values were analyzed with Accu-Chek((R)) Aviva [Roche (Hellas) S.A., Maroussi, Greece], Precision-Xceed((R)) [Abbott Laboratories (Hellas) S.A., Alimos, Greece], and Glucocard X-Sensor((R)) (Menarini Diagnostics S.A., Argyroupolis, Greece). At the same time plasma glucose was analyzed using the World Health Organization's glucose oxidase method. RESULTS: Median plasma glucose values (141.2 [range, 13-553] mg/dL) were significantly different from that produced by the BGMs (P < 0.001). The Accu-Chek Aviva underestimated hypoglycemia (plasma glucose /=250 mg/dL) was overestimated with the Accu-Chek Aviva and the Precision-Xceed by a mean difference of 4.8 mg/dL (95% CI 0-41 mg/dL) and 10.4 mg/dL (CI 0-92 mg/dL), respectively; the same was true for the Glucocard X-Sensor by a mean difference of 20.3 mg/dL (95% CI 0-100 mg/dL) (P < 0.001 for all BGMs). Asymptomatic hypoglycemia was detected in 28% of type 1 and in 18% of type 2 diabetes patients. In all cases, the BGMs were unreliable in sensing hypoglycemia. Multivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that low blood pressure and hematocrit significantly affected glucose measurements obtained with all three BGMs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized diabetes patients, all three frequently used BGMs undersensed hypoglycemia and oversensed hyperglycemia to some extent. Patients and caregivers should be aware of these restrictions of the BGMs.
机译:背景与方法:在600例1型(n = 200)或2型(n = 400)糖尿病住院患者中评估了三个血糖仪(BGM)的准确性和精密度。毛细管血糖值用Accu-Chek Aviva [Roche(Hellas)SA,希腊Maroussi],Precision-Xceed(Abbott Laboratories(Hellas)SA,Alimos,希腊)和Glucocard X-Sensor(R)(Menarini Diagnostics SA,希腊阿格鲁波利斯)。同时,使用世界卫生组织的葡萄糖氧化酶方法分析了血浆葡萄糖。结果:血浆葡萄糖中值(141.2 [范围,13-553] mg / dL)与BGMs产生的血糖值显着不同(P <0.001)。 Accu-Chek Aviva低血糖症(血浆葡萄糖 / = 250 mg / dL)被Accu-Chek Aviva和Precision-Xceed高估了,平均差异为4.8 mg / dL(95%CI 0-41 mg / dL)和10.4 mg / dL (CI 0-92 mg / dL);对于Glucocard X传感器也是如此,其平均差为20.3 mg / dL(95%CI 0-100 mg / dL)(对于所有BGM,P <0.001)。在28%的1型糖尿病患者和18%的2型糖尿病患者中发现无症状性低血糖。在所有情况下,BGM在检测低血糖方面都不可靠。多元线性回归分析表明,低血压和血细胞比容显着影响所有三种BGM所获得的葡萄糖测量值(P <0.05)。结论:在住院的糖尿病患者中,所有三个经常使用的BGM在一定程度上均会低血糖,而高血糖则过度。患者和护理人员应注意BGM的这些限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号