首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >Limitations of the HOMA-B score for assessment of beta-cell functionality in interventional trials-results from the PIOglim study.
【24h】

Limitations of the HOMA-B score for assessment of beta-cell functionality in interventional trials-results from the PIOglim study.

机译:PIOglim研究的结果表明,HOMA-B评分在评估β细胞功能方面的局限性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Drugs with unspecific stimulating effects on beta-cell secretion increase the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-B score, indicating improved beta-cell "function." We investigated whether the beta-cell protection provided by adding pioglitazone (PIO) to glimepiride (GLIM) in comparison to up-titrating the GLIM dose alone is reflected by appropriate changes in several measures of beta-cell function, including HOMA-B score. METHODS: This double-blind, parallel prospective 6-month study was performed with 82 patients (47 men, 35 women; age, 61 +/- 9 years; duration of disease, 5.3 +/- 4.4 years; body mass index, 32.6 +/- 6.0 kg/m(2); hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], 7.3 +/- 0.7%) with GLIM monotherapy (1-3 mg). They were randomized to receive a GLIM + PIO combination with up-titration (2 mg + 30 mg/4 mg + 30 mg/4 mg + 4 mg) or to remain on GLIM (up-titration 4/5/6 mg). Observation parameters determined at baseline and end point included HOMA-B, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, glucose, insulin, and intact proinsulin. RESULTS: There was a slight increase in the HOMA-B score in the GLIM group but not in the GLIM + PIO arm (baseline/end point: for GLIM, 71 +/- 48/88 +/- 64; for PIO + GLIM, 74 +/- 56/69 +/- 52). Improvements in the other observation parameters were predominantly detected in the PIO + GLIM group (HbA1c, 7.20 +/- 0.61%/6.36 +/- 0.90%; HOMA-IR, 7.0 +/- 4.5/4.1 +/- 2.1; intact proinsulin, 12.4 +/- 10.3/7.6 +/- 4.8 pmol/L [all P < 0.05 vs. baseline]) compared with the GLIM group (HbA1c, 7.45 +/- 0.69%/7.15 +/- 0.97% [P < 0.05]; HOMA-IR, 7.4 +/- 4.5/7.5 +/- 4.3 [not significant]; intact proinsulin, 17.3 +/- 21.6/16.3 +/- 15.5 pmol/L [not significant]). CONCLUSIONS: The PIO + GLIM combination led to overall improvement of laboratory biomarkers for beta-cell function, except for HOMA-B. Glimepiride up-titration had no such effects but increased the HOMA-B score. HOMA-B seems to provide misleading results when used as a diagnostic tool in patients treated with sulfonylurea drugs. A corrective term for consideration of proinsulin in the HOMA-B equation may address this limitation.
机译:背景:对β细胞分泌具有非特异性刺激作用的药物可增加稳态模型评估(HOMA)-B评分,表明β细胞“功能”得到改善。我们调查了与单独调高GLIM剂量相比,将吡格列酮(PIO)加到格列美脲(GLIM)中所提供的β细胞保护作用是否反映在包括HOMA-B评分在内的几种β细胞功能指标的适当变化上。方法:这项双盲,平行,前瞻性6个月研究针对82例患者进行了研究(男47例,女35例;年龄61 +/- 9岁;病程5.3 +/- 4.4年;体重指数32.6 +/- 6.0 kg / m(2);使用GLIM单药(1-3 mg)的血红蛋白A1c [HbA1c],7.3 +/- 0.7%。他们被随机分配接受GLIM + PIO联合滴定(2 mg + 30 mg / 4 mg + 30 mg / 4 mg + 4 mg)或继续服用GLIM(滴定4/5/6 mg)。在基线和终点确定的观察参数包括HOMA-B,HOMA-IR,HbA1c,葡萄糖,胰岛素和完整的胰岛素原。结果:GLIM组的HOMA-B评分略有增加,但GLIM + PIO组则没有增加(基线/终点:对于GLIM为71 +/- 48/88 +/- 64;对于PIO + GLIM ,74 +/- 56/69 +/- 52)。 PIO + GLIM组主要观察到其他观察参数的改善(HbA1c,7.20 +/- 0.61%/ 6.36 +/- 0.90%; HOMA-IR,7.0 +/- 4.5 / 4.1 +/- 2.1;胰岛素原完整,与GLIM组(HbA1c,7.45 +/- 0.69%/ 7.15 +/- 0.97%)相比,GLIM组为12.4 +/- 10.3 / 7.6 +/- 4.8 pmol / L [所有P <0.05与基线相比] [P <0.05 ]; HOMA-IR,7.4 +/- 4.5 / 7.5 +/- 4.3 [不显着];完整的胰岛素原,17.3 +/- 21.6 / 16.3 +/- 15.5 pmol / L [不显着])。结论:PIO + GLIM组合导致除HOMA-B以外的β细胞功能实验室生物标志物的全面改善。格列美脲滴定法没有这种作用,但增加了HOMA-B评分。当HOMA-B用作磺酰脲类药物治疗的患者的诊断工具时,似乎提供了令人误解的结果。在HOMA-B公式中考虑胰岛素原的校正性术语可以解决此限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号