...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >Brief Report: Comparison of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Finger-Prick Blood Glucose Levels in Hospitalized Patients Administered Basal-Bolus Insulin
【24h】

Brief Report: Comparison of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Finger-Prick Blood Glucose Levels in Hospitalized Patients Administered Basal-Bolus Insulin

机译:简要报告:住院患者使用基础-大肠胰岛素的连续血糖监测和手指刺血糖水平的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Previous studies have assessed the efficacy of basal-bolus insulin (BBI) in hospitalized patients by measuring four finger-prick blood glucose levels (BGLs) per day. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this BGL monitoring regimen provides an accurate reflection of glycemia in hospitalized patients administered BBI. We hypothesized that, as three of four readings are preprandial, finger-prick BGLs would underestimate the mean glucose concentration. Subjects and Methods: Twenty-six consecutive consenting subjects with type 1 (n = 3) or type 2 (n=23) diabetes mellitus admitted to the hospital and administered insulin glargine once daily and rapid-acting insulin before meals underwent continuous glucose monitoring for up to 72 h. Finger-prick BGLs were performed before each main meal (0700, 1200, and 1700h)and at 2100h. Results: Mean daily glucose concentration was not significantly different when assessed by continuous glucose monitoring and finger-prick BGLs (9.6 ±2.4 vs. 9.6±2.7mmol/L, P = 0.84). A Bland-Altman plot revealed some variability but no bias between the two methods of measurement of glucose concentration. There were 88 postprandial hyperglycemic excursions recorded on continuous glucose monitoring; 61 (69%) were identified by finger-prick BGL monitoring. There were 10 glucose excursions < 4 mmol/L during continuous glucose monitoring; only one was detected by finger-prick BGL monitoring. Conclusions: Traditional finger-prick BGL monitoring provides a reasonable approximation of mean daily glucose concentration in the majority of hospitalized patients receiving BBI but underestimates the prevalence of postprandial hyper-glycemia and hypoglycemia.
机译:背景:以前的研究已经通过每天测量四个手指点刺的血糖水平(BGL)来评估基础推注胰岛素(BBI)在住院患者中的疗效。这项研究的目的是调查这种BGL监测方案是否可以在接受BBI的住院患者中准确反映血糖。我们假设,由于餐前四个读数中的三个读数,手指刺穿BGL会低估平均葡萄糖浓度。受试者和方法:26例连续同意的1型(n = 3)或2型(n = 23)糖尿病患者入院,每天接受一次甘精胰岛素注射,在饭前接受速效胰岛素的连续血糖监测长达72小时。在每次主餐之前(0700、1200和1700h)和2100h进行手指刺BGL。结果:通过连续血糖监测和手指刺穿BGL评估时,平均每日葡萄糖浓度无显着差异(9.6±2.4 vs. 9.6±2.7mmol / L,P = 0.84)。布兰德-奥特曼(Bland-Altman)图显示了两种测量葡萄糖浓度的方法之间的差异,但没有偏差。连续监测血糖有88次餐后高血糖旅行;通过手指刺穿BGL监测发现61例(69%)。连续监测葡萄糖期间,有10次葡萄糖偏移<4 mmol / L;手指刺BGL监测仅检测到一个。结论:传统的手指刺BGL监测可为大多数接受BBI的住院患者提供每日平均血糖浓度的合理近似值,但低估了餐后高血糖和低血糖的患病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号