首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >Noninferiority effects on glycemic control and beta-cell function improvement in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients: basal insulin monotherapy versus continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment.
【24h】

Noninferiority effects on glycemic control and beta-cell function improvement in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients: basal insulin monotherapy versus continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment.

机译:非劣效性对新诊断的2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和β细胞功能改善的影响:基础胰岛素单一疗法与连续皮下胰岛素输注疗法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: In newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, short-term insulin therapy might improve beta-cell function and glycemic control. This study aimed to compare the effects of basal insulin monotherapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) treatment. METHODS: Fifty-nine cases of newly diagnosed T2DM patients with fasting plasma glucose of 9.0-16.7 mmol/L were recruited into this study. They were hospitalized and randomly assigned to a basal insulin monotherapy group (n=27) or a CSII group (n=32). Insulin dosage was titrated according to fasting capillary blood glucose levels, and treatment was stopped after 2 weeks. Intravenous glucose tolerance tests were performed, and blood glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and lipid profiles were measured before therapy and 2 days after therapy withdrawal. RESULTS: Both treatments reduced fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels (after treatment vs. baseline, both P<0.05). Fasting glycemic control target was achieved in 52 cases (88.14%) with 2 weeks of insulin treatment, and there were no significant differences between the glargine and CSII groups (P=0.059). The time to achieve fasting glycemic target in the CSII group was shorter than that in the glargine group (P<0.01). Plasma lipid profiles such as triglycerides and total cholesterol also decreased significantly after the intervention. Overall beta-cell function improved significantly after insulin intervention (P<0.01). Variation did not differ between two groups, nor did the effects on insulin and C-peptide secretion (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of basal insulin monotherapy was similar to that of CSII, and thus basal insulin monotherapy might be a reasonable alternative to CSII for initial insulin therapy in newly diagnosed T2DM patients.
机译:目的:在新诊断的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中,短期胰岛素治疗可能会改善β细胞功能和血糖控制。本研究旨在比较基础胰岛素单一疗法与连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)治疗的效果。方法:本研究招募了59例新诊断的T2DM患者,空腹血糖为9.0-16.7 mmol / L。他们入院并随机分配到基础胰岛素单一疗法组(n = 27)或CSII组(n = 32)。根据空腹毛细血管血糖水平对胰岛素剂量进行滴定,并在2周后停止治疗。进行静脉葡萄糖耐量测试,并在治疗前和停药后2天测量血糖,胰岛素,C肽和脂质分布。结果:两种治疗均降低了禁食和餐后血糖水平(治疗后与基线相比,两者均P <0.05)。接受2周胰岛素治疗的空腹血糖控制目标达到52例(88.14%),甘精胰岛素组与CSII组之间无显着差异(P = 0.059)。 CSII组达到空腹血糖目标的时间短于甘精胰岛素组(P <0.01)。干预后血浆甘油三酯和总胆固醇的血脂水平也显着下降。胰岛素干预后,总体β细胞功能显着改善(P <0.01)。两组之间无差异,对胰岛素和C肽分泌的影响也无差异(P> 0.05)。结论:基础胰岛素单一疗法的疗效与CSII相似,因此对于新诊断的T2DM患者,基础胰岛素单一疗法可能是替代CSII进行初始胰岛素疗法的合理选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号