首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Are there risk factors for complications of perforator-based propeller flaps for lower-extremity reconstruction?
【24h】

Are there risk factors for complications of perforator-based propeller flaps for lower-extremity reconstruction?

机译:下肢重建的基于穿孔器的螺旋桨襟翼是否存在并发症的危险因素?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Conventional pedicled flaps for soft tissue reconstruction of lower extremities have shortcomings, including donor-site morbidity, restricted arc of rotation, and poor cosmetic results. Propeller flaps offer several potential advantages, including no need for microvascular anastomosis and low impact on donor sites, but their drawbacks have not been fully characterized. Questions/purposes: We assessed (1) frequency and types of complications after perforator-based propeller flap reconstruction in the lower extremity and (2) association of complications with arc of rotation, flap dimensions, and other potential risk factors. Methods: From 2007 to 2012, 74 patients (44 males, 30 females), 14 to 87 years old, underwent soft tissue reconstruction of the lower extremities with propeller flaps. General indications for this flap were wounds and small- and medium-sized defects located in distal areas of the lower extremity, not suitable for coverage with myocutaneous or muscle pedicled flaps. This group represented 26% (74 of 283) of patients treated with vascularized coverage procedures for soft tissue defects in the lower limb during the study period. Minimum followup was 1 year (mean, 3 years; range, 1-7 years); eight patients (11%) were lost to followup before 1 year. Complications and potential risk factors, including arc of rotation, flap dimensions, age, sex, defect etiology, smoking, diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease, were recorded based on chart review. Results: Twenty-eight of 66 flaps (42%) had complications. Venous congestion (11 of 66, 17%) and superficial necrosis (seven of 66, 11%) occurred most frequently. Eighteen of the 28 complications (64%) healed with no further treatment; eight patients (29%) underwent skin grafting, and one patient each experienced total flap failure (2%) and partial flap failure (2%). In those patients, a free anterolateral thigh flap was used as the salvage procedure. No correlations were found between complications and any potential risk factor. Conclusions: We were not able to identify any specific risk factors related to complications, and future multicenter studies will be necessary to determine which patients or wounds are at risk of complications. Propeller flaps had a low failure rate and risk of secondary surgery. These flaps are particularly useful for covering small- and medium-sized defects in the distal leg and Achilles tendon region and are a reliable and effective alternative to free flaps. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:用于下肢软组织重建的传统带蒂皮瓣有缺点,包括供体部位发病率,旋转弧度受限以及美容效果不佳。螺旋桨襟翼具有几个潜在的优点,包括不需要微血管吻合和对供体部位的低影响,但是它们的缺点尚未得到充分表征。问题/目的:我们评估了(1)下肢基于穿孔器的螺旋桨瓣重建后的并发症发生频率和类型,以及(2)并发症与旋转弧度,瓣大小和其他潜在危险因素的关联。方法:2007年至2012年,对74例患者(男44例,女30例),年龄14至87岁,进行了螺旋桨瓣下肢软组织重建术。这种皮瓣的一般适应症是位于下肢远端的伤口和中小型缺损,不适合用肌皮或肌肉蒂皮瓣覆盖。在研究期间,该组患者中有26%(283例中的74例)接受了下肢软组织缺损的血管覆盖治疗。最低随访时间为1年(平均3年;范围1-7年); 1年前失访的有8例患者(11%)。根据图表回顾记录并发症和潜在的危险因素,包括旋转弧度,瓣大小,年龄,性别,缺陷病因,吸烟,糖尿病和周围血管疾病。结果:66个皮瓣中有28个(42%)发生并发症。静脉充血(66个中的11个,占17%)和浅表性坏死(66个中的七个,占11%)最常见。 28例并发症中有18例(64%)无需进一步治疗即可治愈; 8例(29%)进行了植皮术,每例1例发生了全部皮瓣衰竭(2%)和部分皮瓣衰竭(2%)。在这些患者中,使用游离的大腿前外侧皮瓣作为挽救程序。在并发症和任何潜在危险因素之间未发现相关性。结论:我们无法确定与并发症相关的任何特定危险因素,未来的多中心研究将有必要确定哪些患者或伤口有并发症的风险。螺旋桨襟翼的失败率低,并且有进行二次手术的风险。这些皮瓣特别适用于覆盖远端腿和跟腱区域的中小尺寸缺陷,并且是游离皮瓣的可靠且有效的替代方法。证据级别:IV级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者说明》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号