...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Zhejiang University. Science, B >Comparison of an SMS text messaging and phone reminder to improve attendance at a health promotion center: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparison of an SMS text messaging and phone reminder to improve attendance at a health promotion center: A randomized controlled trial

机译:比较SMS短信和电话提醒以提高健康促进中心的出勤率:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the efficacy of a short messaging service (SMS) text messaging and phone reminder to improve attendance rates at a health promotion center. Methods: A total of 1 859 participants who had scheduled appointments in the health promotion center of our hospital from April 2007 to May 2007 were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned into 3 groups: control (no reminder) group, SMS text messaging reminder group and telephone reminder group. Attendance rates and costs of interventions were collected. Results: A total of 1848 participants were eligible for analysis. Attendance rates of control, SMS and telephone groups were 80.5%, 87.5% and 88.3%, respectively. The attendance rates were significantly higher in SMS and telephone groups than that in the control group, with odds ratio 1.698, 95% confidence interval 1.224 to 2.316, P=0.001 in the SMS group, and odds ratio 1.829, 95% confidence interval 1.333 to 2.509, P<0.001 in the telephone group. However, there was no difference between the SMS group and the telephone group (P=0.670). The cost effectiveness analysis showed that the cost per attendance for the SMS group (0.31 Yuan) was significantly lower than that for the telephone group (0.48 Yuan). Conclusion: SMS and telephone are effective reminders for improving attendance rate at a health promotion center. SMS reminder may be more cost-effective compared with the telephone reminder.
机译:目的:比较短消息服务(SMS)文本消息和电话提醒的功效,以提高健康促进中心的出勤率。方法:选择2007年4月至2007年5月在我院健康促进中心预约诊治的1 859名参与者,随机分为3组:对照组(无提醒),SMS短信提醒组和电话提醒小组。收集了干预率和干预成本。结果:共有1848名参与者符合分析条件。控制,短信和电话组的出席率分别为80.5%,87.5%和88.3%。 SMS和电话组的出勤率显着高于对照组,比值比1.698,95%置信区间1.224至2.316,SMS组的P = 0.001,比值比1.829,95%置信区间1.333至2.509,电话组中P <0.001。但是,SMS组和电话组之间没有差异(P = 0.670)。成本效益分析表明,短信组的出勤成本(0.31元)明显低于电话组的出勤成本(0.48元)。结论:短信和电话是提高健康促进中心出勤率的有效提醒。与电话提醒相比,SMS提醒可能更具成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号