...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Summary cards for 3 teaching tips on understanding, interpreting and quantifying confounding variables in studies of therapy or harm
【24h】

Summary cards for 3 teaching tips on understanding, interpreting and quantifying confounding variables in studies of therapy or harm

机译:摘要卡,提供有关在治疗或伤害研究中理解,解释和量化混淆变量的3个教学提示的摘要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scenario: Consider a randomized trial, in contrast to an observational study, on an issue of therapy or harm. Pose the issue: "Why do we randomize?" Lead the learners to understand the answer in successively more precise terms.Randomization helps ensure that groups have similar characteristics.Contrast characteristics such as eye color and shoe size to age and disease severity.Lead the learners to understand the relevant characteristics to be those that affect outcome.Lead the learners to distinguish between any outcomes and outcomes of interest to the question being studied.Label such characteristics "prognostic variables" and clarify that they are appropriately called "confounding variables" when they are unequally distributed between study groups.Lead the learners to understand that randomization minimizes the likelihood of both known and unknown confounding variables, whereas observational studies are only able to control for known confounding variables.
机译:方案:与观察性研究相反,考虑一项关于治疗或伤害问题的随机试验。提出问题:“我们为什么要随机化?”引导学习者以更精确的术语来逐步理解答案;随机化有助于确保群体具有相似的特征;对比颜色,鞋子大小与年龄和疾病严重程度的对比特征;引导学习者理解与之相关的特征结果。引导学习者区分所研究问题的任何结果和感兴趣的结果。将此类特征标记为“预后变量”,并阐明当它们在研究组之间分配不均时,将它们适当地称为“混杂变量”。了解随机化可以最大程度地减少已知和未知混杂变量的可能性,而观察性研究只能控制已知混杂变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号