...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Capsule Commentary on Faerber et al., Content Analysis of False and Misleading Claims in Television Advertising for Prescription and Nonprescription Drugs
【24h】

Capsule Commentary on Faerber et al., Content Analysis of False and Misleading Claims in Television Advertising for Prescription and Nonprescription Drugs

机译:关于Faerber等人的胶囊评论,处方药和非处方药电视广告中虚假和误导性声明的内容分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The study by Faerber and Kreling1 adds to a growing literature about direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA), a unique form of drug advertising prohibited in most of the world. They found that of television ads airing from 2008 to 2010, 33 % were objectively true, 57 % were potentially misleading and 10 % were just outright ("pants on fire") false. There were more objectively true claims and fewer false claims for prescription than non-prescription ads.
机译:Faerber和Kreling1的研究增加了有关直接面向消费者的广告(DTCA)的文献,这是世界上大多数国家禁止的独特形式的药品广告。他们发现,从2008年到2010年播放的电视广告中,有33%客观上是真实的,有57%可能是误导性的,而10%则是完全虚假的(“裤子着火了”)。相较于非处方广告,客观上对处方的真实主张和虚假主张更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号