首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Potential unintended consequences due to medicare's 'no pay for errors rule'? A randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention with internal medicine residents.
【24h】

Potential unintended consequences due to medicare's 'no pay for errors rule'? A randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention with internal medicine residents.

机译:因医疗保险的“无误支付规则”而可能导致意外后果吗?对内科住院医师进行教育干预的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Medicare has selected 10 hospital-acquired conditions for which it will not reimburse hospitals unless the condition was documented as "present on admission." This "no pay for errors" rule may have a profound effect on the clinical practice of physicians. OBJECTIVE: To determine how physicians might change their behavior after learning about the Medicare rule. DESIGN: We conducted a randomized trial of a brief educational intervention embedded in an online survey, using clinical vignettes to estimate behavioral changes. PARTICIPANTS: At a university-based internal medicine residency program, 168 internal medicine residents were eligible to participate. INTERVENTION: Residents were randomized to receive a one-page description of Medicare's "no pay for errors" rule with pre-vignette reminders (intervention group) or no information (control group). Residents responded to five clinical vignettes in which "no pay for errors" conditions might be present on admission. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome was selection of the single most clinically appropriate option from three clinical practice choices presented for each clinical vignette. KEY RESULTS: Survey administered from December 2008 to March 2009. There were 119 responses (71%). In four of five vignettes, the intervention group was less likely to select the most clinically appropriate response. This was statistically significant in two of the cases. Most residents were aware of the rule but not its impact and specifics. Residents acknowledged responsibility to know Medicare documentation rules but felt poorly trained to do so. Residents educated about the Medicare's "no pay for errors" were less likely to select the most clinically appropriate responses to clinical vignettes. Such choices, if implemented in practice, have the potential for causing patient harm through unnecessary tests, procedures, and other interventions.
机译:背景:Medicare已选择10项医院获得的条件,除非该条件被证明为“入院时存在”,否则它将不会偿还医院的费用。这种“不为错误付出代价”的规则可能会对医师的临床实践产生深远影响。目的:确定在了解了医疗保险规则后医生如何改变他们的行为。设计:我们对嵌入在线调查中的简短教育干预措施进行了随机试验,使用临床短片评估行为变化。参与者:在以大学为基础的内部医学住院医师项目中,有168位内部医学住院医师有资格参加。干预措施:将居民随机分配到一份一页的描述,内容为Medicare的“不为错误付费”规则,并附有渐晕提示(干预组)或无信息(对照组)。居民对五种临床渐晕症作出了反应,其中入院时可能出现“无偿为错误”的状况。主要指标:主要结局是从针对每个临床小插图提出的三个临床实践选择中选择一个最适合临床的选择。关键结果:这项调查是从2008年12月至2009年3月进行的。共有119项答复(71%)。在五个晕影中,有四个在干预组中不太可能选择最适合临床的反应。这在两个案例中具有统计学意义。大多数居民都知道该规则,但没有意识到其影响和具体情况。居民承认有责任了解Medicare文件规定,但对此却缺乏培训。受过医疗保险“无误支付”教育的居民,不太可能选择最适合临床的对晕影的反应。如果在实践中实施此类选择,则有可能通过不必要的测试,程序和其他干预措施对患者造成伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号