...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Virological Methods >Routine detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA in clinical laboratories: performance of three commercial assays.
【24h】

Routine detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA in clinical laboratories: performance of three commercial assays.

机译:临床实验室中乙肝病毒DNA的常规检测和定量:三种商业化验方法的性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomes in molecular biology-based assays appear to be the most reliable methods for monitoring HBV infection and assessing responses to antiviral treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three HBV-DNA detection and quantification assays currently used for the management of HBV-infected patients: a solution-hybridization assay based on hybrid-capture (Digene Hybrid-Capture, Murex Diagnostics, Dartford, UK); a signal-amplification assay based on 'branched-DNA' (bDNA) technology (Quantiplex HBV DNA, Bayer Diagnostics, Emeryville, CA); and a target-amplification assay based on competitive polymerase chain reaction (Amplicor HBV Monitor, Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA). The Monitor assay was significantly more sensitive than both the hybrid-capture and bDNA methods. This better sensitivity appeared to be clinically relevant. The linear ranges of quantification in the hybrid-capture, bDNA and Monitor methods were 6.5-9 log10 genome copies/ml, 6.5-9.5 log10 genome equivalents/ml, and 3-5.5 log10 genome copies/ml, respectively. However, the HBV-DNA units used in the three assays were not comparable. The specificity of the hybrid-capture, bDNA and Monitor assays was 99.2% (95% confidence interval: 97.7-100.0%), 99.2% (97.7-100.0%), and 97.8% (95.3-100%), respectively. Their within-run coefficients of variation and log10 SDs were 5.5% (+/- 0.025 log10 copies/ml), 6.7% (+/- 0.029 log10 Eq/ml) and 21.0% (+/- 0.093 log10 copies/ml), respectively. Between-run coefficients of variation ranged from 4.4-39.1%, 5-39.5%, and 17.8-96.1%, respectively. The competitive PCR-based Monitor assay appears to be significantly more sensitive but slightly less specific and reproducible than the hybrid-capture and bDNA methods. Given their respective performance, these three assays should be used in complementary fashion in the management of HBV-infected patients.
机译:在基于分子生物学的检测方法中检测和定量乙肝病毒(HBV)基因组似乎是监测HBV感染和评估对抗病毒治疗反应的最可靠方法。这项研究的目的是评估目前用于管理HBV感染患者的三种HBV-DNA检测和定量检测的性能:基于杂交捕获的溶液杂交检测(Digene Hybrid-Capture,Murex Diagnostics,Dartford ,英国);基于“分支DNA”(bDNA)技术(Quantiplex HBV DNA,Bayer Diagnostics,Emeryville,CA)的信号放大分析;以及基于竞争性聚合酶链反应的靶标扩增试验(Amplicor HBV Monitor,Roche Molecular Systems,Pleasanton,CA)。 Monitor方法比混合捕获和bDNA方法都灵敏得多。这种更好的敏感性似乎与临床有关。杂交捕获,bDNA和Monitor方法的定量线性范围分别为6.5-9 log10基因组拷贝数/ml、6.5-9.5 log10基因组当量/ ml和3-5.5 log10基因组拷贝/ ml。但是,这三种测定法中使用的HBV-DNA单位不可比较。杂交捕获,bDNA和Monitor检测的特异性分别为99.2%(95%置信区间:97.7-100.0%),99.2%(97.7-100.0%)和97.8%(95.3-100%)。它们的运行内变异系数和log10 SD分别为5.5%(+/- 0.025 log10拷贝/毫升),6.7%(+/- 0.029 log10 Eq / ml)和21.0%(+/- 0.093 log10拷贝/毫升),分别。批间变异系数分别为4.4-39.1%,5-39.5%和17.8-96.1%。基于竞争的PCR的Monitor分析方法似乎比杂交捕获和bDNA方法灵敏度更高,但特异性和重现性更低。鉴于它们各自的性能,这三种测定应以互补的方式用于HBV感染患者的治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号