首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Virological Methods >Comparison of the plaque assay and 50% tissue culture infectious dose assay as methods for measuring filovirus infectivity
【24h】

Comparison of the plaque assay and 50% tissue culture infectious dose assay as methods for measuring filovirus infectivity

机译:噬菌斑测定法和50%组织培养物感染剂量测定法作为线状病毒感染性测定方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two common methods of quantifying filovirus infectivity, a plaque assay and 50% cell culture infectious dose (TCID50) endpoint dilution assay, were compared. The two assays were performed side by side using the same virus stock sample to determine the correlation between the results of the two assays. The TCID50 assay appeared to be more sensitive but slightly more variable, and there was a tenfold difference in the numerical results of these methods of enumeration. The advantages and disadvantages of both assays are discussed. Both methods are useful and practicable in filovirus research, and this comparison will be hugely beneficial to the filovirus research community as it seeks to become more united. Further work in this area should be performed to ensure consistency in filovirus research. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:比较了两种定量线状病毒感染性的常用方法,噬菌斑测定法和50%细胞培养物感染剂量(TCID50)终点稀释测定法。使用相同的病毒库样品并排执行两个测定,以确定两个测定结果之间的相关性。 TCID50分析似乎更灵敏,但变化更大,这些枚举方法的数值结果相差十倍。讨论了两种测定法的优缺点。两种方法在丝状病毒研究中都是有用且可行的,并且这种比较将在丝状病毒研究界寻求更加团结的过程中极大地受益。为了确保丝状病毒研究的一致性,应该在这一领域进行进一步的工作。 (C)2013由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号