...
首页> 外文期刊>JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. >Economic BurdeE Associated With Hospital Postadmission Dehydration
【24h】

Economic BurdeE Associated With Hospital Postadmission Dehydration

机译:与医院住院后脱水相关的经济负担

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Development of dehydration after hospital admission can be a measure of quality care, but evidence describing the incidence, economic burden, and outcomes of dehydration in hospitalized patients is lacking. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare costs and resource utilization of U.S. patients experiencing postadmission dehydration (PAD) with those who do not in a hospital setting. Methods: All adult inpatient discharges, excluding those with suspected dehydration present on admission (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] codes for dehydration: 276.0,276.1,276.5), were identified from the Premier database using ICD-9-CM codes. PAD and no-PAD (NPAD) groups were matched on propensity score adjusting for demographics (age, sex, race, medical, elective patients), patient severity (All Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups severity scores), and hospital characteristics (geographic location, bed size, teaching and urban hospital). Costs, length of stay (LOS), and incidence of mortality and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) were compared between groups using the ttest for continuous variables and the x2 test for categorical variables. Results: In total, 86,398 (2.1%) of all the selected patients experienced PAD. Postmatching mean total costs were significantly higher for the PAD group compared with the NPAD group ($33,945 vs $22,380; P < .0001). Departmental costs were also significantly higher for the PAD group (all P < .0001). Compared with the NPAD group, the PAD group had a higher mean LOS (12.9 vs 8.2 days), a higher incidence of CAUTI (0.6% vs 0.5%), and higher in-hospital mortality (8.6% vs 7.8%) (all P < .05). The results for subgroup analysis also showed significantly higher total cost and longer LOS days for patients with PAD (all P < .05). Conclusions: The economic burden associated with hospital PAD in medical and surgical patients was substantial.
机译:背景:入院后脱水的发生可以作为对质量护理的一种衡量标准,但是缺乏描述住院患者脱水的发生率,经济负担和结局的证据。目的:本研究的目的是比较住院后脱水(PAD)的美国患者与未住院的美国患者的成本和资源利用。方法:从Premier数据库中确定所有成人住院病人出院,但怀疑入院时出现脱水的情况(国际疾病分类,第九次修订,临床修改[ICD-9-CM]脱水代码:276.0,276.1,276.5)使用ICD-9-CM代码。 PAD和no-PAD(NPAD)组根据人口统计学(年龄,性别,种族,医疗,选拔患者),患者严重程度(所有患者细化诊断相关组的严重程度得分)和医院特征(地理位置)的倾向得分调整进行匹配,床铺尺寸,教学和城市医院)。使用连续变量t检验和分类变量x2检验比较两组之间的费用,住院时间(LOS),死亡率和导管相关性尿路感染(CAUTI)。结果:在所有入选患者中,共有86,398名(2.1%)经历了PAD。 PAD组的赛后平均总成本明显高于NPAD组(33,945美元对22,380美元; P <.0001)。 PAD组的部门成本也显着较高(所有P <.0001)。与NPAD组相比,PAD组的平均LOS较高(12.9比8.2天),CAUTI发生率较高(0.6%比0.5%),院内死亡率较高(8.6%比7.8%)(所有P <.05)。亚组分析的结果还显示,PAD患者的总费用显着更高,而LOS天数更长(所有P <.05)。结论:内科和外科患者与医院PAD相关的经济负担是巨大的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号