首页> 外文期刊>Journal of viral hepatitis. >How far is noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis from replacing liver biopsy in hepatitis C?
【24h】

How far is noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis from replacing liver biopsy in hepatitis C?

机译:肝纤维化的无创评估与替代丙型肝炎肝活检有多远?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chronic hepatitis C represents a major cause of progressive liver disease that can eventually evolve into cirrhosis and its end-stage complications. Formation and accumulation of fibrosis in the liver is the common pathway that leads to evolutive liver disease. Precise staging of liver fibrosis is essential for patient management in clinical practice because the presence of bridging fibrosis represents a strong indication for antiviral therapy, while cirrhosis requires a specific follow-up. Liver biopsy has always represented the standard of reference for assessment of hepatic fibrosis, but it has limitations: it is invasive, costly and prone to sampling errors. Recently, blood markers and instrumental methods have been proposed for the noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C. However, international guidelines do not recommend the widespread use of noninvasive methods for liver fibrosis in clinical practice. This is because of, in some cases, unsatisfactory accuracy and incomplete validation of others. Some studies suggest that the effectiveness of noninvasive methods for assessing liver fibrosis may increase when they are combined, and a number of sequential and synchronous algorithms have been proposed for this purpose, with the aim of reducing rather than substituting liver biopsies. This may represent a rational and reliable approach for implementing noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in clinical practice. It could allow more comprehensive first-line screening of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C than would be feasible with liver biopsy alone.
机译:慢性丙型肝炎代表了进行性肝病的主要原因,该疾病最终可发展为肝硬化及其末期并发症。肝中纤维化的形成和积累是导致进化性肝病的常见途径。肝纤维化的精确分期对于临床实践中的患者管理至关重要,因为桥接纤维化的存在代表着抗病毒治疗的强烈指征,而肝硬化则需要进行特定的随访。肝活检一直代表着评估肝纤维化的参考标准,但是它有局限性:它是侵入性的,昂贵的并且容易出现抽样错误。最近,已经提出了血液标记物和仪器方法用于丙型肝炎的肝纤维化的非侵入性评估。但是,国际准则不建议在临床实践中广泛使用非侵入性方法治疗肝纤维化。在某些情况下,这是因为准确性不理想,而其他情况下的验证不完整。一些研究表明,将非侵入性方法结合使用来评估肝纤维化的有效性可能会提高,并且为此目的已经提出了许多顺序和同步算法,目的是减少而不是代替肝活检。这可能代表在临床实践中实施肝纤维化非侵入性评估的合理而可靠的方法。与仅进行肝活检相比,它可以对丙型肝炎的肝纤维化进行一线筛查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号