首页> 外文期刊>JSLS : >The evolution and long-term results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
【24h】

The evolution and long-term results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

机译:腹腔镜抗反流手术治疗胃食管反流病的进展及长期效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: For nearly 2 decades, the laparoscopic correction of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has demonstrated its utility. However, the surgical technique has evolved over time, with mixed long-term results. We briefly review the evolution of antireflux surgery for the treatment of GERD, provide an update specific to the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), and analyze the factors predictive of a desirable outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and Medline database searches were performed to identify articles regarding the laparoscopic treatment of GERD. Emphasis was placed on randomized control trials (RCTs) and reports with follow-up >1 year. Specific parameters addressed included operative technique, resolution of symptoms, complications, quality of life, division of short gastric vessels (SGVs), mesh repair, and approximation of the crura. Those studies specifically addressing follow-up of <1 year, the pediatric or elderly population, redo fundoplication, and repair of paraesophageal hernia and short esophagus were excluded. RESULTS: LARS has varied in technical approach through the years. Not until recently have more long-term, objective studies become available to allow for evidenced-based appraisals. Our review of the literature found no long-term difference in the rates of heartburn, gas-bloat, antacid use, or patient satisfaction between laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication. In addition, several studies have shown that more patients had an abnormal pH profile following laparoscopic partial as opposed to total fundoplication. Conversely, dysphagia was more common following laparoscopic total versus partial fundoplication in 50% of RCTs at 12-month follow-up, though this resolved over time, being present in only 20% with follow-up >24 months. We confirmed that preoperative factors, such as hiatal hernia, atypical symptoms, poor antacid response, body mass index (BMI), and postoperative vomiting, are potential predictors of an unsatisfactory long-term outcome. Last, no trial disfavored division of the short gastric vessels (SGVs), closure of the crura, or mesh repair for hiatal defects. CONCLUSION: LARS has significantly evolved over time. The laparoscopic total fundoplication appears to provide more durable long-term results than the partial approach, as long as the technical elements of the operation are respected. Division of the SGVs, closure of the crura, and the use of mesh for large hiatal defects positively impacts long-term outcome. Hiatal hernia, atypical symptoms, poor antacid response, body mass index (BMI), and postoperative vomiting are potential predictors of failure in LARS.
机译:背景:近二十年来,腹腔镜纠正胃食管反流病(GERD)已证明其实用性。但是,外科手术技术随着时间的推移而发展,取得了长期的喜忧参半。我们简要回顾了抗反流外科手术治疗GERD的进展,提供了针对腹腔镜抗反流外科手术(LARS)长期疗效的更新,并分析了预后理想的因素。材料与方法:进行PubMed和Medline数据库检索,以鉴定有关腹腔镜治疗GERD的文章。重点放在随机对照试验(RCT)上,并随访1年以上。涉及的具体参数包括手术技术,症状缓解,并发症,生活质量,胃短血管(SGVs)的分割,网状修复和逼近。那些专门针对<1年的随访,儿童或老年人群,重做胃底折叠术以及食管旁食管疝和食管短小的修复的研究被排除在外。结果:多年来,LARS的技术方法各不相同。直到最近,才有更多的长期,客观研究可用于基于证据的评估。我们对文献的审查发现,腹腔镜尼森和Toupet胃底折叠术之间的胃灼热,气胀,抗酸药使用或患者满意度之间没有长期差异。此外,一些研究表明,与完全胃底折叠术相比,更多患者在腹腔镜部分手术后具有异常的pH值。相反,在12个月的随访中,有50%的RCT中吞咽困难在腹腔镜全盲与部分胃底折叠术中比较普遍,尽管随着时间的推移逐渐消失,但在随访> 24个月时仅占20%。我们证实,术前因素,例如食管裂孔疝,非典型症状,抗酸药反应差,体重指数(BMI)和术后呕吐,是长期疗效不理想的潜在预测因素。最后,没有试验不利于胃短血管的分割,结骨的闭合或裂孔缺损的网状修复。结论:LARS随着时间的推移已发生了显着变化。只要尊重手术的技术要素,与部分手术相比,腹腔镜全眼底折叠术可以提供更持久的长期效果。 SGV的划分,结骨的闭合以及对大型裂孔裂孔使用网孔对长期结果产生积极影响。食管裂孔疝,非典型症状,抗酸反应差,体重指数(BMI)和术后呕吐是LARS失败的潜在预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号