...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >A two-stage retention debridement protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infections.
【24h】

A two-stage retention debridement protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infections.

机译:针对急性假体周围关节感染的两阶段保留清创术方案。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Due to the historically poor infection control rates with debridement and component retention for acute periprosthetic infections we developed a new approach for treating acute periprosthetic total joint infections: initial debridement with prosthesis retention and placement of antibiotic-impregnated cement beads followed by a second debridement within 7 days, at which time the beads are removed and new modular parts inserted. Intravenous antibiotics were used for 6 weeks followed by oral antibiotics. Depending on the clinical situation, antibiotics are discontinued or in selected patients continued indefinitely. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined the ability of this two-stage debridement to control infection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 20 patients who underwent this technique; 2 had postoperative and 18 had hematogenous infections. The primary outcome measure was the infection control. The minimum followup was 1 year (mean, 3.5 years; range, 1.2-7.5 years). RESULTS: Two of the 20 patients had persistent infection. There were no failures in the acute postoperative group (0 of 2) and two of 18 in the acute hematogenous group. Of the 18 patients without evidence of persistent infection, 10 were no longer on antibiotics at the most recent followup and eight were treated with long-term antibiotics due to compromised host status. CONCLUSIONS: The control of infection in 18 of 20 patients using this technique compares favorably with historical success rates, which range from 24% to 100%. Further research is required to analyze the individual contribution of debridement technique, the use of serial debridements, local depot antibiotics, and combination antibiotic therapy on short-term infection control rates and the long-term persistent control of periprosthetic infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.
机译:背景:由于历史上对急性假体周围感染的清创和成分保留的感染控制率较差,我们开发了一种治疗急性假体周围全关节感染的新方法:先进行假体保留,然后再植入抗生素浸渍的水泥珠,再进行第二次清创在7天内,将珠子移开并插入新的模块化零件。静脉使用抗生素6周,然后口服抗生素。根据临床情况,抗生素可以终止使用或无限期继续使用。问题/目的:我们确定了该两阶段清创术控制感染的能力。方法:我们回顾性分析了20例接受该技术的患者的病历。术后2例,血源性感染18例。主要结果指标是感染控制。最低随访时间为1年(平均3.5年;范围1.2-7.5年)。结果:20例患者中有2例持续感染。急性术后组(2个中的0个)和急性造血组18个中的两个没有失败。在18例无持续感染迹象的患者中,有10例在最近的随访中不再使用抗生素,还有8例由于宿主状态受损而接受了长期抗生素治疗。结论:使用该技术控制感染的20名患者中有18名与历史成功率相称,其成功率从24%到100%不等。需要进一步的研究来分析清创术技术的个人贡献,连续清创术的使用,局部长效抗生素以及联合抗生素治疗对假体周围感染的短期感染控制率和长期持续控制。证据级别:IV级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者指南》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号