...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Prospective, randomized study of cutting balloon angioplasty versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of hemodialysis access stenoses
【24h】

Prospective, randomized study of cutting balloon angioplasty versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of hemodialysis access stenoses

机译:切开球囊成形术与常规球囊成形术治疗血液透析通路狭窄的前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this trial was to compare the rates of patency achieved by cutting and conventional balloon angioplasty to treat hemodialysis access stenoses. Methods: End-stage renal failure patients (at three tertiary referral centers) with significant hemodialysis access stenoses were prospectively randomized to have percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) by either cutting or conventional balloons. Patients with more than one hemodynamically significant stenosis were excluded. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the primary assisted patency rates for the two groups. Results: The study randomized 623 patients into two groups, and the duration of follow-up was 15 ± 3 months. In the cutting balloon angioplasty group, the clinical success rate was 89% (282 of 316 stenoses). In the conventional balloon angioplasty group, the clinical success rate was 86% (265 of 307 stenoses; P =.637). Assisted primary patency for cutting PTA was statistically significantly higher at 6 months and 1 year (86% and 63%) than that for conventional PTA (56% and 37%, respectively; P =.037) in the treatment of stenosis of the graft-to-vein anastomosis. In the venous stenosis subgroup, equivalent primary assisted patency at 6 months and 1 year was observed for cutting PTA (84% and 55%) and conventional PTA (70% and 46%, respectively; P =.360). In the intragraft stenosis subgroup, primary assisted patency was equivalent at 6 months and 1 year for cutting PTA (67% and 39%) and conventional PTA (62% and 49%, respectively; P =.371). In the arterial anastomotic stenosis subgroup, assisted primary patency at 6 months and 1 year was equivalent for cutting PTA (70% and 30%) and conventional PTA (75% and 33%, respectively; P =.921). Conclusions: Cutting balloon angioplasty proved to be a safe and effective treatment of graft-to-vein anastomotic stenosis, with significantly higher patency than that of conventional balloon angioplasty.
机译:目的:该试验的目的是比较切割和常规球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析通路狭窄的通畅率。方法:前瞻性将具有重大血液透析通路狭窄的终末期肾衰竭患者(在三个三级转诊中心)通过切割或常规球囊随机分为经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)。排除具有多于一种血液动力学显着性狭窄的患者。使用Kaplan-Meier方法比较两组的主要辅助通畅率。结果:本研究将623例患者随机分为两组,随访时间为15±3个月。在切割球囊血管成形术组中,临床成功率为89%(316个狭窄中的282个)。在常规球囊血管成形术组中,临床成功率为86%(307个狭窄中的265个; P = .637)。在移植物狭窄方面,辅助PTA切除PTA的6个月和1年(86%和63%)的统计学显着高于传统PTA(分别为56%和37%; P = .037)。静脉吻合术。在静脉狭窄亚组中,在切割PTA(分别为84%和55%)和常规PTA(分别为70%和46%; P = .360)时,在6个月和1年时观察到了等效的主要辅助通畅。在移植内狭窄亚组中,切割PTA(分别为67%和39%)和常规PTA(分别为62%和49%,分别为6%和49%; P = 0.371)在6个月和1年时的主要辅助通畅率是相等的。在动脉吻合口狭窄亚组中,在6个月和1年时辅助初级通畅相当于切割PTA(分别为70%和30%)和常规PTA(分别为75%和33%; P = .921)。结论:切开球囊血管成形术已被证明是一种安全有效的方法,用于移植到静脉的吻合口狭窄,其通畅性明显高于传统球囊血管成形术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号