...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral investigations >Levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine for third molar surgery: Quality of anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia and local vascular effects
【24h】

Levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine for third molar surgery: Quality of anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia and local vascular effects

机译:左布比卡因vs布比卡因用于第三磨牙手术:麻醉质量,术后镇痛和局部血管作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: The main purpose of this prospective, double-blind, randomized study was to evaluate anaesthetic parameters, postoperative analgesia and vasoactive properties of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for lower third molar surgery. Material and methods: Sixty patients (ASA I) were scheduled for lower third molar surgery under inferior alveolar nerve block, lingual nerve block and buccal nerve block (mandibular nerve blocks) obtained with 3 ml of 0.5 % levobupivacaine and 3 ml of 0.5 % bupivacaine. Success rate, onset and duration of three nerve bocks were evaluated by electrical pulp testing, pinprick testing and signs of soft tissue anaesthesia (patient-reported numbness). Intensity of intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia were measured with visual analogue scale (VAS) and numeric rating scale (NRS). The time of first postoperative pain reported and analgesic consumption were also recorded. The laser Doppler flowmetry was used for the measurement of the first premolar pulpal blood flow. Results: There were no differences between levobupivacaine and bupivacaine regarding the success rate, onset and duration of mandibular nerve blocks as well as intensity of postoperative analgesia and analgesic consumption. Intensity of intraoperative anaesthesia and duration of postoperative analgesia were significantly higher in the levobupivacaine than in the bupivacaine group. Both anaesthetics showed similar biphasic vasoactive effect. Conclusions: Levobupivacaine 0.5 % achieved superiority over bupivacaine 0.5 % in the intensity of intraoperative anaesthesia and duration of postoperative analgesia for lower third molar surgery under the mandibular nerve blocks. Clinical relevance: It seems that the plain levobupivacaine (0.5 %) could be an effective alternative to plain bupivacaine (0.5 %) in those dental procedures which require profound bone and soft tissue anaesthesia.
机译:目的:这项前瞻性,双盲,随机研究的主要目的是评估左下布比卡因和布比卡因的麻醉参数,术后镇痛和血管活性,以用于下颌第三磨牙手术。材料和方法:60例(ASA I)患者计划在下牙槽神经阻滞,舌神经阻滞和颊神经阻滞(下颌神经阻滞)下接受3毫升0.5%左布比卡因和3毫升0.5%布比卡因的下第三磨牙手术。通过电浆测试,针刺测试和软组织麻醉的体征(患者报告的麻木感)评估了三个神经袋的成功率,发作和持续时间。用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数字评分量表(NRS)测量术中麻醉和术后镇痛的强度。还记录了首次术后疼痛的时间和镇痛剂的消耗。激光多普勒血流仪用于测量第一磨牙前牙髓血流量。结果:左布比卡因和布比卡因之间的成功率,下颌神经阻滞的发作和持续时间以及术后镇痛和镇痛的强度没有差异。左旋布比卡因的术中麻醉强度和术后镇痛时间显着高于布比卡因组。两种麻醉剂均显示出相似的双相血管活性作用。结论:对于下颌第三磨牙手术,在下颌神经阻滞下,术中麻醉强度和术后镇痛持续时间优于左旋布比卡因0.5%。临床意义:似乎在需要深层骨骼和软组织麻醉的牙科手术中,普通左旋布比卡因(0.5%)可以有效替代普通布比卡因(0.5%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号