...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for pathologic vertebral fractures in the medicare population: Safer and less expensive than open surgery
【24h】

Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for pathologic vertebral fractures in the medicare population: Safer and less expensive than open surgery

机译:经皮椎体成形术和后凸成形术治疗医疗保险人群中的病理性椎体骨折:比开放手术更安全,更便宜

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: To compare cost and outcomes of surgical and percutaneous treatments of pathologic vertebral fractures. Materials and Methods: Standard Medicare 5 anonymized inpatient files (1999-2009) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a diagnosis of vertebral fracture without spinal cord injury and primary or metastatic bony malignancy were divided into percutaneous or surgical groups based on whether they received vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty or surgical treatment. Patients who had no intervention or both interventions were excluded. Cost, length of stay, and type of discharge were examined while controlling for demographic and comorbidity variables. Results: A total of 451 patients were included; 52 received percutaneous treatment and 48 received surgery. Patients treated percutaneously were older (P<.001) and more likely to be female (P=.04). Percutaneous therapy predicted $14,862 less Medicare cost and $13,565 less overall cost (P<.001 for both), and 4.1 fewer inpatient days (P<.001). Patients who underwent surgery had higher odds of death (odds ratio=3.38, P=.016), discharge to a rehabilitation facility (odds ratio=3.3, P=.003), and transfer to another inpatient facility (odds ratio=8.53, P<.001), and lower odds of discharge to home (odds ratio=0.42, P<.001) and hospice (odds ratio=0.08, P=.002). Conclusions: In a Medicare population with bony malignancy and vertebral fractures, percutaneous therapy predicted significantly reduced cost and length of stay versus surgery. Patients who underwent percutaneous therapy were significantly less likely to die, be transferred, or be discharged to rehabilitation facilities, and were more likely to be discharged to home or hospice.
机译:目的:比较病理性脊椎骨折的手术和经皮治疗的费用和结果。材料和方法:回顾性审查了标准Medicare 5名匿名住院患者档案(1999-2009年)。诊断为没有骨折的椎体骨折且原发性或转移性骨恶性肿瘤的患者根据是否接受椎体成形术/椎体后凸成形术或手术治疗而分为经皮或手术组。没有干预或两种干预的患者均被排除。在控制人口统计学和合并症变量的同时,检查了费用,住院时间和出院类型。结果:共纳入451例患者。 52例接受了经皮治疗,48例接受了手术。经皮治疗的患者年龄较大(P <.001),女性更可能为女性(P = .04)。经皮治疗预测的Medicare费用将减少$ 14,862,总费用减少$ 13,565(两者均P <.001),住院天数减少4.1(P <.001)。接受手术的患者死亡几率更高(几率= 3.38,P = .016),出院到康复机构(几率= 3.3,P = .003),并转移到另一家住院机构(几率= 8.53, P <.001),并降低出院率(赔率= 0.42,P <.001)和临终关怀(赔率= 0.08,P = .002)。结论:在患有骨性恶性肿瘤和椎骨骨折的Medicare人群中,经皮治疗预计与手术相比可显着降低成本和住院时间。接受经皮治疗的患者死亡,转移或出院到康复设施的可能性大大降低,而出院或临终关怀的可能性更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号