首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Comparison of Adjunctive Use of Rofecoxib versus Ibuprofen in the Management of Postoperative Pain after Uterine Artery Embolization.
【24h】

Comparison of Adjunctive Use of Rofecoxib versus Ibuprofen in the Management of Postoperative Pain after Uterine Artery Embolization.

机译:罗非昔布与布洛芬辅助使用在子宫动脉栓塞术后疼痛处理中的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of the present study was to compare the antiinflammatory effectiveness of rofecoxib with that of ibuprofen in the first 5 days after uterine artery embolization (UAE). The secondary aim was to compare pain levels and narcotic use among patients treated with different embolic agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2003 to June 2004, 68 UAE procedures were performed by one of the authors (D.M.H.). Of this group, 50 women agreed to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria were limited to contraindication to either drug or current steroid or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use. In a randomized, double-blinded fashion, patients received a numbered pill box that contained one of the two agents and its placebo counterpart. Four times per day for 5 days, patients recorded their level of pain on a visual analog scale and the amount of narcotic analgesic drug needed at that time. Score sheets were returned by mail after completion. During the course of the study, three embolic agents (Gold Embospheres, Contour SE particles, and Embospheres) were used in succession, with similar numbers of patients in each group. RESULTS: Four patients were excluded from analysis: two who were readmitted to the hospital for treatment of pain (one treated with each antiinflammatory medication) and two who failed to complete their score sheets. Subject demographics were very similar with respect to antiinflammatory drug treatment and embolic agent, except that the average age of patients in the Embosphere group was 6 years older than in the Embosphere Gold and Contour SE groups (P= .02). There was no difference in the pain level and narcotic drug intake between the two drug arms, but among embolic agents, the Embosphere Gold group tended to have a higher overall average pain score (P = .12), and the two patients readmitted were in this group. Patients in the Contour SE group tended to use a lower amount of narcotic drug than those in the other two embolic agent groups (P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between rofecoxib and ibuprofen with respect to postprocedural pain or narcotic use after UAE. Embolic agent appeared to have a greater impact, with patients in the Embosphere Gold group reporting higher pain scores and those in the Contour SE group requiring a lower amount of narcotic drug than those in the Embosphere Gold or Embosphere groups.
机译:目的:本研究的主要目的是比较罗非昔布与布洛芬在子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)后的前5天的抗炎效果。次要目的是比较接受不同栓塞剂治疗的患者的疼痛程度和麻醉剂使用情况。材料与方法:2003年7月至2004年6月,一位作者(D.M.H.)执行了68项阿联酋程序。在这一组中,有50名妇女同意参加这项研究。排除标准仅限于禁忌使用药物或目前使用类固醇或非类固醇消炎药。患者以随机,双盲的方式接受了编号的药盒,其中装有两种药物之一及其对应的安慰剂。每天四次,共5天,患者以视觉模拟量表记录他们的疼痛程度以及当时所需的麻醉镇痛药量。评分表在完成后通过邮件退回。在研究过程中,相继使用了三种栓塞剂(金栓子,Contour SE颗粒和栓子),每组中的患者数量相似。结果:4例患者被排除在分析之外:2例再次入院治疗疼痛(一种用抗炎药治疗)和2例未完成评分表。关于抗炎药治疗和栓塞剂,受试者的人口统计学非常相似,不同的是,Embosphere组患者的平均年龄比Embosphere Gold和Contour SE组高6岁(P = .02)。两组药物之间的疼痛程度和麻醉药物的摄入量没有差异,但是在栓塞剂中,Embosphere Gold组的总体平均疼痛评分往往更高(P = .12),并且两名重新入院的患者在这个小组。与其他两个栓塞剂组相比,Contour SE组的患者倾向于使用较少量的麻醉药(P = .09)。结论:罗非考昔和布洛芬之间在阿联酋术后疼痛或麻醉后使用无差异。栓塞剂似乎具有更大的影响,Embosphere Gold组的患者报告的疼痛评分更高,而Contour SE组的患者所需的麻醉药量低于Embosphere Gold或Embosphere组的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号