首页> 外文期刊>Clinical otolaryngology: official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery >Endoscopic versus microscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
【24h】

Endoscopic versus microscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机译:内镜与镜下经蝶窦垂体手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery has been increasingly replacing microscopic surgery as the state of the art trans-sphenoidal approach. OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW: To assess the efficacy and safety of pure endoscopic approach in comparison with microscopic approach in pituitary surgery. TYPE OF REVIEW: Literature review and meta-analysis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE (1952-10th February 2010), EMBASE (1974-10th February 2010) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to the 10th February 2010. EVALUATION METHOD: Review of all English-language studies comparing endoscopic and microscopic techniques. RESULTS: Eleven relevant studies were identified with a total of 806 patients, 369 of whom had endoscopic surgery and 437 microscopic surgery. The initial remission rate of hypersecretion of functioning adenomas was not significantly different between the endoscopic and the microscopic group [(OR: 1.34(95% CI: 0.73-2.47); P=0.35; 66% remission rate in endoscopic group versus 60% in microscopic)].The proportion of patients with complete tumour removal was not significantly different in the endoscopic group than in the microscopic group [(OR: 0.83, (95% CI: 0.52-1.33); P=0.44]. The rate of CSF leak attributable to the surgical method did not differ significantly between endoscopic and microscopic group. Post-operative diabetes insipidus was less frequent in those having endoscopic surgery [15%versus 28%P=0.003]. Regarding the other intra cranial and nasal complications attributable to surgical technique, the occurrence rate in endoscopic group was significant lower compared with microscopic group (13%versus 1.2% respectively, P<0.05). Patients in the endoscopic group had significant shorter postoperative hospital stay with a range from 3.7 to 4.4 days, than those of microscopic group with a range from 5.4 to 5.7 days [(WMD: -1.53, (95% CI: -2.30 to -0.77); P<0.00001)]. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding its limitations, the present systematic review, based on the currently available evidence, suggests that endoscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery is associated with similar rates of complete tumour excision and remission rates. Endoscopic surgery was associated with fewer complications related to surgical technique and a shorter hospital stay.
机译:背景:内镜经蝶窦手术已逐渐取代显微镜手术,成为最新的经蝶窦手术方法。审查的目的:评估纯内镜与垂体手术中显微手术相比的有效性和安全性。综述类型:文献综述和荟萃分析。搜索策略:对MEDLINE(1952年10月10日至2010年2月10日),EMBASE(1974年2月10日至2010年2月10日)和Cochrane对照试验中央登记册进行系统文献检索。评价方法:回顾所有比较内窥镜检查的英语研究和微观技术。结果:确定了11项相关研究,共806例患者,其中369例接受了内镜手术,437例接受了显微手术。内镜组和镜下组功能性腺瘤高分泌的初始缓解率无显着性差异[(OR:1.34(95%CI:0.73-2.47); P = 0.35;内镜组的缓解率是66%,而内镜组是60%。内镜组完全切除肿瘤的患者比例与镜组无明显差异[(OR:0.83,(95%CI:0.52-1.33); P = 0.44]。内镜组和镜组的手术方法引起的渗漏没有显着差异,内镜手术组的尿崩症发生率较低[15%vs 28%P = 0.003],其他颅内和鼻腔并发症可归因于手术技术方面,内镜组的发生率明显低于镜组(分别为13%和1.2%,P <0.05),内镜组患者术后住院时间明显缩短。 nge为3.7至4.4天,而显微组为5.4至5.7天[(WMD:-1.53​​,(95%CI:-2.30至-0.77); P <0.00001)]。结论:尽管有其局限性,但基于目前可获得的证据,本系统综述提示内镜下经蝶窦垂体手术与肿瘤完全切除率和缓解率相似。内窥镜手术与手术技术相关的并发症更少,住院时间更短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号