首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Micro-mobile foot compression device compared with pneumatic compression device.
【24h】

Micro-mobile foot compression device compared with pneumatic compression device.

机译:微动脚压缩装置与气动压缩装置相比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: A combination mechanical-pharmacologic regimen is an accepted prophylactic treatment against symptomatic venous thromboembolism for patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasties. Foot pumps have been recognized as effective mechanical devices. Research suggests pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is associated with complications and foot pumps offer an adjunct or alternative approach. Presumably the effectiveness of foot pumps relate to enhancement of venous flow. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared an established foot pump system with a new mobile foot pump for their ability to influence mean peak venous velocity in the common femoral, popliteal, and posterior tibial veins. METHODS: We evaluated 60 healthy subjects with the established and the novel foot-pump systems. Ultrasonography was used to measure baseline and peak venous velocity with mechanical compression. We constructed 95% confidence intervals (CI) on the mean differences between the two devices to establish equivalence limits. We compared ratios of peak velocity to resting velocity. Subjects subjectively rated the two foot pumps with respect to size, fit, and comfort. RESULTS: The 95% CI test for equivalence of the mean differences between the two devices was inconclusive. The novel device augmented the venous velocity 11 times greater than the resting velocity in the posterior tibial vein and three times greater than the resting velocity in the popliteal vein. The established foot pump augmented the venous velocity 15 times greater than the resting velocity in the posterior tibial vein and four times greater than the resting velocity in the popliteal vein. The novel device rated better for size, fit, and comfort when compared with the established device. CONCLUSIONS: The established foot pump tended to be associated with greater peak velocities; the novel device produced more consistent mean peak venous velocities and may be more acceptable to patients and caregivers.
机译:背景:机械-药物联合疗法是针对接受全髋和膝关节置换术的患者的症状性静脉血栓栓塞的公认预防性治疗。脚踏泵已被公认为有效的机械设备。研究表明,静脉血栓栓塞的药理预防与并发症有关,脚踏泵提供了辅助或替代方法。脚踏泵的有效性大概与静脉流量的增加有关。问题/目的:我们比较了已建立的脚踏泵系统和新型的移动式脚踏泵,因为它们影响股骨,pop部和胫后静脉的平均峰值静脉速度的能力。方法:我们用已建立的和新颖的脚踏泵系统评估了60名健康受试者。超声用于通过机械压缩来测量基线和峰值静脉速度。我们在两个设备之间的均值差上构建了95%的置信区间(CI),以建立等效极限。我们比较了峰值速度与静止速度的比率。受试者在尺寸,合身性和舒适性方面对两个脚踏泵进行了主观评价。结果:95%CI测试的两个设备之间的平均差异是否相等尚无定论。该新颖装置将静脉速度提高到胫后静脉中的静息速度的11倍,并且比vein骨静脉中的静息速度的三倍大。既定的脚泵使静脉速度增加,比胫后静脉的静息速度大15倍,比and静脉的静息速度大4倍。与现有设备相比,该新型设备在尺寸,贴合性和舒适性方面的评分更高。结论:建立的脚踏泵往往与更高的峰值速度有关。这种新型装置产生了更一致的平均峰值静脉流速,对于患者和护理人员而言可能更容易接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号