...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis: JTH >Comparison of two prognostic models for acute pulmonary embolism: clinical vs. right ventricular dysfunction-guided approach.
【24h】

Comparison of two prognostic models for acute pulmonary embolism: clinical vs. right ventricular dysfunction-guided approach.

机译:两种急性肺栓塞预后模型的比较:临床对右心室功能障碍指导的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Recently, some prognostic models for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) have been proposed. We investigated whether the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) prognostic approaches result in different prognoses. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with acute PE were included. According to the ESC guidelines, high-risk patients were identified by the presence of shock/hypotension, intermediate-risk patients by elevated troponin I or right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by echocardiography, and low-risk patients by the absence of any of the above. In the PESI model, 11 clinical variables, easily accessible at the bedside, were used to generate three risk classes. The main outcomes were all-cause and PE-related in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-10.8) of 510 died. According to the ESC model, 40% were at low risk of short-term mortality, 54% at intermediate risk, and 6% at high risk. The distribution according to the PESI model was 31% (P < 0.05 vs. ESC), 49% and 20% (P < 0.05 vs. ESC), respectively. Mortality increased through the risk classes (P < 0.01), without significant differences between the models. The ESC model identified with higher accuracy than the PESI model both high-risk and low-risk patients (P < 0.05 for both). When patients with shock/hypotension were excluded, the PESI model stratified patients into classes with increasing PE-related mortality (0.7%, 4.3%, and 11.6%, P < 0.05). Troponin I and right ventricular dysfunction added incremental prognostic value to the PESI model, particularly in normotensive patients at intermediate risk. CONCLUSIONS: The ESC model showed higher accuracy than the PESI model in identifying high-risk and low-risk patients. In normotensive patients, the PESI model could guide clinical management as well as troponin I and echocardiography testing.
机译:背景:最近,一些急性肺栓塞(PE)的预后模型已经被提出。我们调查了肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)的预后方法是否导致不同的预后。方法:纳入连续性成人急性PE患者。根据ESC指南,通过电击/低血压的存在来识别高危患者,通过超声心动图评估的肌钙蛋白I升高或右心功能不全可确定为中危患者,而没有上述任何一项则可识别为低危患者。在PESI模型中,使用11个易于在床旁获取的临床变量来生成三种风险类别。主要结局是全因和与体育有关的住院死亡率。结果:510名患者中有41名患者(8%,95%置信区间[CI] 5.8-10.8)死亡。根据ESC模型,40%处于短期死亡的低风险中,54%处于中度风险,6%处于高风险。根据PESI模型的分布分别为31%(P <0.05 vs. ESC),49%和20%(P <0.05 vs. ESC)。死亡率随风险类别的增加而增加(P <0.01),模型之间无显着差异。在高风险和低风险患者中,ESC模型比PESI模型具有更高的准确性(两者均P <0.05)。当排除休克/低血压患者时,PESI模型将患者分为与PE相关的死亡率增加的类别(0.7%,4.3%和11.6%,P <0.05)。肌钙蛋白I和右心室功能障碍增加了PESI模型的预后价值,特别是对于处于中等风险的血压正常的患者。结论:ESC模型在识别高危和低危患者方面显示出比PESI模型更高的准确性。在血压正常的患者中,PESI模型可以指导临床管理以及肌钙蛋白I和超声心动图检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号