首页> 外文期刊>Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences >Double-blind randomized controlled study of coblation tonsillotomy versus coblation tonsillectomy on postoperative pain in children.
【24h】

Double-blind randomized controlled study of coblation tonsillotomy versus coblation tonsillectomy on postoperative pain in children.

机译:消融扁桃体切除术与消融扁桃体切除术治疗儿童术后疼痛的双盲随机对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish if children experienced any difference in pain, between coblation tonsillectomy and coblation tonsillotomy. DESIGN: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed. SETTING: District general hospital department of Otolaryngology. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen children listed for tonsillectomy were recruited into the study. Each was randomly assigned either tonsillotomy or tonsillectomy in the right tonsil. The contralateral tonsil was removed by the other method. In the first 24-h period (while in hospital) the children were interviewed at 2, 5, 10 and 24 h to quantify the pain they perceived in right and left sides. There was a four point visual analogue scoring system for monitoring pain. The power of the study was 80%. In this study the patients were their own controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analogue pain scores were plotted against time and the area under the curves was calculated (AUC). RESULTS: The AUC mean difference was 0.47. A t-test for the difference gives a P-value of 0.85 and a 95% confidence interval for difference is -0.79 to 5.73, which clearly contains zero. Using AUC as a combined pain score there is no statistically significant difference between tonsillotomy and tonsillectomy (power value of 80%). CONCLUSIONS: There is no demonstrable statistical difference between techniques when measuring pain experienced by children in the 24-h postoperative period.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定儿童扁桃体切除术和扁桃体切除术在疼痛方面是否存在任何差异。设计:进行了一项双盲随机对照试验。单位:区总医院耳鼻咽喉科。参与者:列入扁桃体切除术的18名儿童被纳入研究。每个人都被随机分配右扁桃体进行扁桃体切开术或扁桃体切除术。用另一种方法去除对侧扁桃体。在最初的24小时内(住院期间),分别在2、5、10和24小时对孩子进行访谈,以量化他们在左右两侧感觉到的疼痛。有一个用于监控疼痛的四点视觉模拟评分系统。这项研究的功效为80%。在这项研究中,患者是他们自己的对照。主要观察指标:将视觉模拟疼痛评分与时间作图,并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:AUC平均差异为0.47。差异的t检验得出P值为0.85,差异的95%置信区间为-0.79至5.73,显然包含零。使用AUC作为综合疼痛评分,扁桃体切开术和扁桃体切除术之间没有统计学上的显着差异(功效值为80%)。结论:在测量术后24小时内儿童所经历的疼痛时,两种方法之间没有可证明的统计学差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号