首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: safety of avastin in lung trial (MO19390).
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: safety of avastin in lung trial (MO19390).

机译:一线贝伐单抗联合化疗对老年晚期或复发性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌老年患者的安全性和有效性:avastin在肺试验中的安全性(MO19390)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Safety of Avastin in Lung (MO19390) was an international, open-label, single-arm study, which assessed the safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab (Avastin(R)) in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients (n = 2212) with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A preplanned subgroup analysis was performed to examine these outcomes in elderly patients older than 65 years. METHODS: Eligible patients with nonsquamous NSCLC received up to six cycles of bevacizumab (7.5 or 15 mg/kg) plus any standard of care chemotherapy. Patients who did not experience disease progression after induction therapy continued bevacizumab therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was safety; secondary end points included time to disease progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Data were evaluated for 623 patients older than 65 years (mean age 70.6). The majority were Whites (86.2%) with stage IV disease (79.7%) and had adenocarcinoma (83.5%). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) of special interest was similar for elderly and younger patients (any grade bleeding 38.2% versus 38.3%; any grade hypertension 33.1% versus 30.6%; any grade proteinuria 33.4% versus 29.3%). Most AEs were grade less than or equal to 2. Serious AEs were reported in 45.3 and 34.7% of elderly and younger patients, respectively. Median OS was similar in elderly and younger patients (14.6 months in both age groups), as were TTP (8.2 versus 7.6 months), response rate (49.3% versus 52.4%), and disease control rate (89.3% versus 88.4%). Similar results were seen in a post hoc comparison of the older than 70 years and 70 years or younger subgroups: TTP was 8.6 months versus 7.7 months, respectively; OS was 14.6 months in both subgroups; response rate was 49% and 52%, respectively; incidence of AEs of special interest was comparable. CONCLUSION: Patients older than 65 years with nonsquamous NSCLC derive a similar clinical benefit from first-line bevacizumab-based therapy as their younger counterparts and do not experience increased toxicity.
机译:简介:Avastin在肺中的安全性(MO19390)是一项国际性的,开放标签的单臂研究,其评估了一线贝伐单抗(Avastin(R))联合标准化疗对患者的安全性和有效性(n = 2212)患有晚期或复发性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。进行了预先计划的亚组分析,以检查65岁以上老年患者的这些结局。方法:符合条件的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者接受多达六个周期的贝伐单抗(7.5或15 mg / kg)加任何标准的护理化疗。诱导治疗后未经历疾病进展的患者继续使用贝伐单抗治疗,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性。主要终点是安全性;次要终点包括疾病进展时间(TTP)和总生存期(OS)。结果:评估了623位65岁以上(平均年龄70.6)的患者的数据。大部分是白人(86.2%),患有IV期疾病(79.7%),并患有腺癌(83.5%)。特别引起关注的不良事件(AEs)的发生率与老年和年轻患者相似(任何等级的出血38.2%比38.3%;任何等级的高血压33.1%比30.6%;任何等级的蛋白尿33.4%比29.3%)。大多数AE等级小于或等于2。据报道,老年和年轻患者中严重AE分别为45.3和34.7%。老年和年轻患者的OS中位数相似(两个年龄组分别为14.6个月),TTP(8.2个月对7.6个月),缓解率(49.3%对52.4%)和疾病控制率(89.3%对88.4%)相似。对70岁以上和70岁或更年轻的亚组进行事后比较发现了类似的结果:TTP分别为8.6个月和7.7个月;两个亚组的OS为14.6个月;回应率分别为49%和52%;特别令人关注的不良事件发生率是可比的。结论:65岁以上非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的患者从一线贝伐单抗治疗中获得了与年轻患者相似的临床获益,并且未见毒性增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号