首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: safety of avastin in lung trial (MO19390).
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: safety of avastin in lung trial (MO19390).

机译:一线Bevacizumab Plus化疗在老年晚期或复发性非小细胞肺癌中的化疗的安全性和有效性:肺试验中Avastin的安全性(MO19390)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Safety of Avastin in Lung (MO19390) was an international, open-label, single-arm study, which assessed the safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab (Avastin(R)) in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients (n = 2212) with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A preplanned subgroup analysis was performed to examine these outcomes in elderly patients older than 65 years. METHODS: Eligible patients with nonsquamous NSCLC received up to six cycles of bevacizumab (7.5 or 15 mg/kg) plus any standard of care chemotherapy. Patients who did not experience disease progression after induction therapy continued bevacizumab therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was safety; secondary end points included time to disease progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Data were evaluated for 623 patients older than 65 years (mean age 70.6). The majority were Whites (86.2%) with stage IV disease (79.7%) and had adenocarcinoma (83.5%). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) of special interest was similar for elderly and younger patients (any grade bleeding 38.2% versus 38.3%; any grade hypertension 33.1% versus 30.6%; any grade proteinuria 33.4% versus 29.3%). Most AEs were grade less than or equal to 2. Serious AEs were reported in 45.3 and 34.7% of elderly and younger patients, respectively. Median OS was similar in elderly and younger patients (14.6 months in both age groups), as were TTP (8.2 versus 7.6 months), response rate (49.3% versus 52.4%), and disease control rate (89.3% versus 88.4%). Similar results were seen in a post hoc comparison of the older than 70 years and 70 years or younger subgroups: TTP was 8.6 months versus 7.7 months, respectively; OS was 14.6 months in both subgroups; response rate was 49% and 52%, respectively; incidence of AEs of special interest was comparable. CONCLUSION: Patients older than 65 years with nonsquamous NSCLC derive a similar clinical benefit from first-line bevacizumab-based therapy as their younger counterparts and do not experience increased toxicity.
机译:简介:肺部的Avastin(Mo19390)的安全是一项国际,开放标签单臂研究,评估了一线贝伐单抗(Avastin(R))与标准化疗组合患者的安全性和有效性(n = 2212)具有先进或复发的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。进行了预先进行的亚组分析,以检查65岁的老年患者的这些结果。方法:符合条件的Nonsquous NSClc患者最多可收到六个贝伐单抗(7.5或15mg / kg)加上任何护理化疗的患者。在诱导治疗后没有经历疾病进展的患者继续败脂疗法,直至疾病进展或不可接受的毒性。主要终点是安全;次要终点包括疾病进展(TTP)和总存活时间(OS)。结果:723名比65年龄(平均70.6岁)的患者评估数据。大多数是白人(86.2%),阶段疾病(79.7%),腺癌(83.5%)。特殊兴趣的不良事件(AES)的发病率类似于老年人和年轻患者(任何等级出血38.2%,患者的级别高血压33.1%对30.6%;任何等级蛋白尿33.4%对29.3%)。大多数AES的等级小于或等于2.严重的AES分别在45.3和34.7%的老年人和年轻患者中报告。中位OS在老年人和年轻患者(两龄龄群体中的14.6个月)类似,如TTP(8.2与7.6个月),反应率(49.3%,52.4%)和疾病控制率(89.3%与88.4%)。在70岁及70岁或更年轻的亚组的后HOC比较中观察到类似的结果:TTP分别为8.6个月,分别为7.7个月;在两个亚组中为14.6个月;响应率分别为49%和52%; AES的发病率是可比的。结论:65岁以65岁的患者从一线贝伐单抗的治疗中获得类似的临床益处,作为其年轻同行,不经历增加的毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号