...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex (CT-2103, PPX) in combination with carboplatin versus standard paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of PS 2 patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
【24h】

Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex (CT-2103, PPX) in combination with carboplatin versus standard paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of PS 2 patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

机译:III期试验比较了紫杉醇poliglumex(CT-2103,PPX)联合卡铂与标准紫杉醇和卡铂在未接受化疗的PS 2初发性晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中的治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Performance status (PS) 2 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience more toxicity, lower response rates, and shorter survival times than healthier patients treated with standard chemotherapy. Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), a macromolecule drug conjugate of paclitaxel and polyglutamic acid, reduces systemic exposure to peak concentrations of free paclitaxel and may lead to increased concentrations in tumors due to enhanced vascular permeability. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive PS 2 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) and either PPX (210 mg/m/10 min without routine steroid premedication) or paclitaxel (225 mg/m/3 h with standard premedication) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were enrolled. Alopecia, arthralgias/myalgias, and cardiac events were significantly less frequent with PPX/carboplatin, whereas grade > or =3 neutropenia and grade 3 neuropathy showed a trend of worsening. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions despite the absence of routine premedication in the PPX arm. Overall survival was similar between treatment arms (hazard ratio, 0.97; log rank p = 0.769). Median and 1-year survival rates were 7.9 months and 31%, for PPX versus 8 months and 31% for paclitaxel. Disease control rates were 64% and 69% for PPX and paclitaxel, respectively. Time to progression was similar: 3.9 months for PPX/carboplatin versus 4.6 months for paclitaxel/carboplatin (p = 0.210). CONCLUSION: PPX/carboplatin failed to provide superior survival compared with paclitaxel/carboplatin in the first-line treatment of PS 2 patients with NSCLC, but the results with respect to progression-free survival and overall survival were comparable and the PPX regimen was more convenient.
机译:简介:表现状态(PS)2名非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者比标准化疗更健康的患者毒性更高,反应率更低,生存时间更短。紫杉醇poliglumex(PPX)是紫杉醇和聚谷氨酸的大分子药物共轭物,可减少全身暴露于游离紫杉醇峰值浓度的时间,并可能由于血管通透性增强而导致肿瘤中的浓度升高。方法:将未接受化疗的PS 2晚期NSCLC患者随机分配接受卡铂(曲线下面积= 6)和PPX(210 mg / m / 10 min,无需常规类固醇前药)或紫杉醇(225 mg / m / 3 h)每三周一次。主要终点是总体生存率。结果:共纳入400例患者。 PPX /卡铂的脱发,关节痛/肌痛和心脏事件的发生率显着降低,而>或= 3级中性粒细胞减少和3级神经病则表现出恶化的趋势。尽管在PPX组中没有常规的预先用药,但超敏反应的发生率没有显着差异。治疗组之间的总生存率相似(危险比为0.97;对数秩p = 0.769)。 PPX的中位和1年生存率分别为7.9个月和31%,紫杉醇为8个月和31%。 PPX和紫杉醇的疾病控制率分别为64%和69%。进展时间相似:PPX /卡铂为3.9个月,而紫杉醇/卡铂为4.6个月(p = 0.210)。结论:在一线治疗PS 2 NSCLC患者中,PPX /卡铂无法提供比紫杉醇/卡铂更好的生存率,但无进展生存期和总生存期的结果相当,PPX方案更方便。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号