...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities >Literacy Interventions for Students with Physical and Developmental Disabilities Who Use Aided AAC Devices: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Literacy Interventions for Students with Physical and Developmental Disabilities Who Use Aided AAC Devices: A Systematic Review

机译:对使用辅助AAC设备的肢体和发育残疾学生的读写干预:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This review evaluates research on literacy interventions for persons with physical and developmental disabilities who use aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Electronic database searches were completed to identify studies published between 1989 and 2009. Eighteen studies (?41 participants) were identified for inclusion in this review. Across studies a variety of instructional strategies were used to teach phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, text comprehension, and participation in literacy activities. These strategies included direct instruction, scaffolding of communicative attempts, least-to-most prompting with time delay, writing workshop, and story mapping. The results of these studies indicated that systematic instruction including scaffolding, direct instruction, and least-to-most prompting with time delay may be the most effective strategies to teach literacy skills to this population. These results are discussed in relation to participant characteristics, the effectiveness of interventions, and the reported social validity of interventions. Suggestions for future research are discussed.
机译:这篇评论评估了针对使用辅助性补充性和替代性交流(AAC)的身体和发育残障人士的扫盲干预措施的研究。电子数据库搜索已完成,以识别1989年至2009年之间发表的研究。确定了18篇研究(?41名参与者)纳入本评价。在整个研究中,使用了多种教学策略来教授音素意识,语音,词汇,文本理解和参与扫盲活动。这些策略包括直接指导,交流尝试的支架,有时间延迟的从最小到最大提示,写作研讨会和故事地图。这些研究的结果表明,系统的教学包括脚手架,直接教学和最不及时的延迟提示可能是向该人群教授识字技能的最有效策略。讨论了有关参与者特征,干预措施的有效性以及所报告的干预措施的社会有效性的这些结果。讨论了对未来研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号