首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Development Economics >Corruption and product market competition: An empirical investigation
【24h】

Corruption and product market competition: An empirical investigation

机译:腐败与产品市场竞争:实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We analyze the relationship between product market competition and corruption. The existing literature typically views corruption as extortion of “pre-existing” rents. This perspective suggests that competition usually reduces corruption, although generally the sign of this relationship is ambiguous. Shleifer and Vishny (1993), however, show that cost-reducing corruption is promoted by product market competition. That is, the effect of competition on corruption depends of the nature of corruption.Unlike the existing empirical studies that employ cross-country data and general measures of corruption, we test the competition-corruption relationship using firm-level information. Our approach overcomes significant estimation difficulties that resultfrom relying on cross-country data; for instance, we include country fixed effects, and we deal with potential endogeneities by instrumenting competition with US capital-labor ratios for the appropriate industries. Contrary to the existing empirical work, we show that stronger product market competition is associated mostly with greater corruption of the cost-reducing variety.
机译:我们分析了产品市场竞争与腐败之间的关系。现有文献通常将腐败视为“现有”租金的勒索。这种观点表明,竞争通常可以减少腐败,尽管这种关系的迹象通常是模棱两可的。但是,Shleifer和Vishny(1993)指出,降低产品成本的腐败是由产品市场竞争促进的。也就是说,竞争对腐败的影响取决于腐败的性质。与现有的使用跨国数据和一般腐败度量的实证研究不同,我们使用企业级信息来检验竞争与腐败的关系。我们的方法克服了由于依赖跨国数据而导致的重大估计困难;例如,我们将国家固定效应包括在内,并通过采用适当行业的美国资本劳动比率来衡量竞争来应对潜在的内生性。与现有的经验工作相反,我们表明,较强的产品市场竞争主要与降低成本的品种的更大腐败有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号