首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Optical Society of America, B. Optical Physics >Use of etalon-immune distances to reduce the influence of background signals in frequency-modulation spectroscopy and noise-immune cavity-enhanced optical heterodyne molecular spectroscopy
【24h】

Use of etalon-immune distances to reduce the influence of background signals in frequency-modulation spectroscopy and noise-immune cavity-enhanced optical heterodyne molecular spectroscopy

机译:使用标准具免疫距离来减少背景信号在调频光谱和抗噪声腔增强光学外差分子光谱中的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The detection sensitivity of phase-modulated techniques such as frequency-modulation spectroscopy (FMS) and noise-immune cavity-enhanced optical heterodyne molecular spectroscopy (NICE-OHMS) is often limited by etalon background signals. It has previously been shown that the impact of etalons can be reduced by the use of etalon-immune distances (EIDs), i.e., by separating the surfaces that give rise to etalons by a distance of q. L-m, where L-m is given by c/2n nu(m), where, in turn, n and nu(m) are the index of refraction between the components that make up the etalon (thus most often that of air) and the modulation frequency, respectively, and where q is an integer (i.e., 1, 2, 3,.) or half-integer (i.e., 1/2, 1, 3/2,.) for the dispersion and absorption modes of detection, respectively. An etalon created by surfaces separated by an EID will evade detection and thereby not contribute to any background signal. The concept of EIDs in FMS and NICE-OHMS is in this work demonstrated, scrutinized, and discussed in some detail. It is shown that the influence of EIDs on the absorption and dispersion modes of detection is significantly different; signals detected at the dispersion phase are considerably less sensitive to deviations from exact EID conditions than those detected at the absorption phase. For example, the FM background signal from an etalon whose length deviates from an EID by 2.5% of L-m (e.g., by 1 cm for an L-m of 40 cm), detected in dispersion, is only 9% of that in absorption. This makes the former mode of detection the preferred one whenever a sturdy immunity against etalons is needed or when optical components with parallel surfaces (e.g., lenses, polarizers, or beam splitters) are used. The impact of the concept of EIDs on NICE-OHMS is demonstrated by the use of Allan-Werle plots. (C) 2014 Optical Society of America
机译:诸如调频光谱(FMS)和抗噪声腔增强光学外差分子光谱(NICE-OHMS)等相位调制技术的检测灵敏度通常受到标准具背景信号的限制。先前已经表明,通过使用标准具-免疫距离(EID),即通过将产生标准具的表面分开q距离,可以减少标准具的影响。 Lm,其中Lm由c / 2n nu(m)给出,其中n和nu(m)依次是组成标准具(因此,通常是空气)和调制之间的折射率对于检测的色散和吸收模式,q分别为整数(即​​1、2、3 、.)或半整数(即1 / 2、1、3 / 2 ..) 。由被EID分隔的表面创建的标准具将逃避检测,因此不会对任何背景信号有所贡献。在这项工作中,将对FMS和NICE-OHMS中的EID的概念进行演示,审查和详细讨论。结果表明,EIDs对检测的吸收和色散模式的影响差异很大。与在吸收阶段检测到的信号相比,在分散阶段检测到的信号对精确EID条件偏差的敏感度要低得多。例如,在色散中检测到的标准具的FM背景信号与EID的偏差为L-m的2.5%(例如,对于40cm的L-m偏差为1cm),仅为吸收值的9%。每当需要对标准具的坚固免疫力或使用具有平行表面的光学组件(例如透镜,偏振器或分束器)时,这都会使前一种检测模式成为首选。 EIDs概念对NICE-OHMS的影响通过使用Allan-Werle图来证明。 (C)2014年美国眼镜学会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号