...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Comparative study of simple and complex open elbow dislocations
【24h】

Comparative study of simple and complex open elbow dislocations

机译:简单和复杂的开放肘关节脱位的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Open elbow dislocations are rare injuries. Most of the evidence related to these dislocations is found in case reports or in series with closed injuries. We reviewed the experiences of three centers in the treatment of open elbow dislocations. Question/purposes: We compared the results after operative treatment of simple and complex open dislocations in terms of (1) ROM, (2) functional score, and (3) complications. Methods: Eighteen patients were retrospectively included in this study: 11 with simple open elbow dislocations and seven with complex open elbow dislocations. Mean age was 40 years. Thirteen were men. Eight patients presented neurovascular injuries. Evaluation included ROM of the elbow and forearm as measured by hand-held goniometer. We then classified the results using the 100-point Broberg and Morrey functional rating index based on ROM, grip strength, elbow stability, and pain. Scores of 95 to 100 were considered excellent, 80 to 94 good, 60 to 79 fair, and less than 60 poor. Complications were recorded. Minimum followup was 6 months (mean, 25 months; range, 6-72 months). Results: We found no differences between simple and complex open elbow dislocations related to ROM (median flexion/extension: 117?versus 110? p = 0.12; forearm rotation: 160?versus 170? p = 0.67). According to the Broberg and Morrey score, four patients had excellent results, five good, and one fair in the simple dislocation group, whereas in the complex dislocation group, four patients had excellent results, two good, and one fair (p = 0.8). No difference in complication rate was found between groups (p = 0.63). All complications in the simple dislocation group were neurovascular. In the complex dislocation group, there was one case of brachial artery occlusion, two cases of heterotopic ossification, one case of infection and nonunion, and one case of infection. No patients had recurrent elbow instability. Conclusions: No differences between simple and complex open elbow dislocations were found in terms of ROM, functional results, and rate of complications. Complications in the simple dislocation group were related to neurovascular injuries in contrast to the complex dislocation group where complications were associated with the bony injury. Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:肘关节脱位是罕见的伤害。与这些脱位有关的大多数证据可在病例报告中找到,也可以在闭合性损伤中找到。我们回顾了三个中心治疗开放性肘关节脱位的经验。问题/目的:我们根据(1)ROM,(2)功能评分和(3)并发症比较了简单和复杂的开放性脱位的手术治疗结果。方法:本研究回顾性纳入18例患者:11例为简单的开放性肘关节脱位,7例为复杂的开放性肘关节脱位。平均年龄为40岁。十三个人。 8例患者出现神经血管损伤。评价包括通过手持式测角仪测量的肘部和前臂的ROM。然后,我们根据ROM,握力,肘部稳定性和疼痛程度,使用100点Broberg和Morrey功能评分指数对结果进行分类。 95分到100分被认为是优秀,80分到94分,60分到79分,差于60分。记录并发症。最小随访时间为6个月(平均25个月;范围6-72个月)。结果:我们发现与ROM相关的简单和复杂的开放性肘关节脱位之间没有差异(中位屈伸:117对110对p = 0.12;前臂旋转:160对170对p = 0.67)。根据Broberg和Morrey评分,简单脱位组中有4例患者有优异的结果,5例良好,其中1例,而复杂脱位组中有4例患者具有优异的结果,2例中有1例(p = 0.8) 。两组之间的并发症发生率无差异(p = 0.63)。简单脱位组的所有并发症均为神经血管。在复杂脱位组中,肱动脉阻塞1例,异位骨化2例,感染和不愈合1例,感染1例。没有患者复发性肘关节不稳定。结论:在ROM,功能结果和并发症发生率方面,简单和复杂的开放性肘关节脱位之间没有差异。简单脱位组的并发症与神经血管损伤有关,而复杂脱位组的并发症与骨损伤有关。证据级别:IV级,预后研究。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者说明》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号