首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the North American Benthological Society >Does leaf chemistry differentially affect breakdown in tropical vs temperate streams? Importance of standardized analytical techniques to measure leaf chemistry
【24h】

Does leaf chemistry differentially affect breakdown in tropical vs temperate streams? Importance of standardized analytical techniques to measure leaf chemistry

机译:叶片化学性质是否会不同地影响热带与温带河流的分解?标准化分析技术对测量叶片化学的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Comparisons of the effects of leaf litter chemistry on leaf breakdown rates in tropical vs temperate streams are hindered by incompatibility among studies and across sites of analytical methods used to measure leaf chemistry. We used standardized analytical techniques to measure chemistry and breakdown rate of leaves from common riparian tree species at 2 sites, 1 tropical and 1 temperate, where a relatively large amount of information is available on litter chemistry and breakdown rates in streams (La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica, and Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina, USA). We selected 8 common riparian tree species from La Selva and 7 from Coweeta that spanned the range of chemistries of leaf litter naturally entering streams at each site. We predicted that concentrations of secondary compounds would be higher in the tropical species than in the temperate species and that high concentrations of condensed tannins would decrease breakdown rates in both sites. Contrary to our predictions, mean concentration of condensed tannins was significantly greater (2.6x, p < 0.001) for species at Coweeta than for species at La Selva. Concentration of condensed tannins was negatively correlated with breakdown rate among Coweeta species (r = –0.80), not among La Selva species, and negatively correlated when the 2 sites were combined (r = –0.53). Concentrations of structural compounds were strongly correlated with breakdown rate at both sites (Coweeta species, lignin r = –0.94, cellulose r = –0.77; La Selva species, cellulose r = –0.78, C r = –0.73). The chemistries of 8 riparian species from La Selva and 7 riparian species from Coweeta were not as different as expected. Our results underline the importance of standardized analytical techniques when making cross-site comparisons of leaf chemistry.
机译:研究之间以及用于测量叶片化学的分析方法的跨站点之间的不兼容性,阻碍了对凋落物化学对热带和温带河流叶片分解速率影响的比较。我们使用标准化的分析技术来测量2个地点,1个热带地区和1个温带地区的常见河岸树种的化学成分和叶片分解率,其中可以获得相对大量的垃圾化学和河流分解率信息(La Selva Biological Station (哥斯达黎加和美国北卡罗莱纳州的科韦塔水文实验室)。我们选择了La Selva的8种常见河岸树种和Coweeta的7种树种,这些树种跨越了在每个站点自然进入河流的凋落物的化学范围。我们预测,热带物种中次要化合物的浓度将比温带物种中的高,并且高浓度的浓缩单宁酸将降低两个地点的分解率。与我们的预测相反,Coweeta物种的单宁浓缩单宁浓度平均更高(2.6x,p <0.001)。单宁中浓缩单宁的浓度与分解率呈负相关(r = –0.80),而在La Selva物种之间则不相关;当两个位点组合时,呈负相关(r = –0.53)。在两个位置上,结构化合物的浓度均与分解速率密切相关(Coweeta物种,木质素r = –0.94,纤维素r = –0.77; La Selva物种,纤维素r = –0.78,C r = –0.73)。来自La Selva的8种河岸物种和来自Coweeta的7种河岸物种的化学性质没有预期的不同。我们的结果强调了在进行叶化学的跨站点比较时标准化分析技术的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号