...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand =: Chotmaihet thangphaet >Neonatal morbidity and mortality for repeated cesarean section vs. normal vaginal delivery to uncomplicated term pregnancies at Srinagarind hospital
【24h】

Neonatal morbidity and mortality for repeated cesarean section vs. normal vaginal delivery to uncomplicated term pregnancies at Srinagarind hospital

机译:在斯利那加林德医院,反复剖腹产的新生儿发病率和死亡率与正常阴道分娩的情况比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the morbidities and mortality of neonates delivered by elective repeated cesarean section vs. normal vaginal delivery among women with uncomplicated term pregnancies. Material and Method: A retrospective descriptive study was done between January 2009 and December 2011 to determine the morbidities and mortality among uncomplicated term pregnancies at Srinagarind Hospital. Three hundred seventy two neonates delivered by elective repeated cesarean section vs. 1,581 by normal vaginal delivery. Results: A significantly greater number of neonates in the elective repeated cesarean section group required oxygen for neonatal resuscitation compared to neonates in the normal vaginal delivery group (37.6% vs. 20.9%, p<0.001). Neonates delivered by elective repeated cesarean section were more frequently admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (1.1% vs. 0%, p<0.001) and had longer hospital stays (4.56±2.45 vs. 4.07±1.44 days, p<0.001). The latter not only had a higher rate of respiratory distress syndrome (0.8% vs. 0%, p<0.001) and transient tachypnea of the newborn (3.2% vs. 0.3%, p<0.001), which required more respiratory support, they also had a higher rate of infection (2.4% vs. 0.8%, p<0.05) than neonates delivered by normal vaginal delivery. Neonates born by normal vaginal delivery, however, had more birth trauma and hyperbilirubinemia than neonates born by elective repeated cesarean section (8.8% vs. 2.4%, p<0.001 and 31.8% vs. 22.6%, p<0.05, respectively). There was no difference in the mortality rate between the groups. Conclusion: Even among uncomplicated term pregnancies, cesarean section is associated with more neonatal respiratory morbidity and sepsis while those delivered by normal vaginal delivery tend to have a higher rate of birth trauma and hyperbilirubinemia. Clinicians should therefore be concerned about the route of delivery and the probability of negative neonatal outcomes.
机译:目的:评估无并发症足月妊娠妇女选择性剖宫产与正常阴道分娩分娩的新生儿的发病率和死亡率。材料与方法:回顾性描述性研究在2009年1月至2011年12月之间进行,以确定Srinagarind医院单纯并发症足月妊娠的发病率和死亡率。择期重复剖宫产分娩的三百七十二例新生儿与正常阴道分娩的一百零八例相比。结果:与正常阴道分娩组的新生儿相比,选择性重复剖宫产术组中需要氧气进行新生儿复苏的新生儿人数要多得多(37.6%比20.9%,p <0.001)。选择性剖宫产分娩的新生儿更常进入新生儿重症监护病房(1.1%vs. 0%,p <0.001),住院时间更长(4.56±2.45 vs. 4.07±1.44天,p <0.001)。后者不仅具有更高的呼吸窘迫综合征发生率(0.8%vs. 0%,p <0.001)和新生儿短暂性呼吸急促(3.2%vs. 0.3%,p <0.001),需要更多的呼吸支持,他们正常阴道分娩的新生儿感染率也更高(2.4%vs. 0.8%,p <0.05)。但是,通过正常阴道分娩出生的新生儿比通过选择性重复剖宫产出生的新生儿有更多的出生创伤和高胆红素血症(分别为8.8%vs. 2.4%,p <0.001和31.8%vs. 22.6%,p <0.05)。两组之间的死亡率没有差异。结论:即使在简单的足月妊娠中,剖宫产也与新生儿呼吸系统疾病和败血症相关,而正常阴道分娩的剖宫产往往具有较高的出生创伤和高胆红素血症发生率。因此,临床医生应关注分娩的途径和新生儿预后不良的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号