...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the National Cancer Institute >Re: Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.
【24h】

Re: Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.

机译:回复:早期子宫内膜癌的系统性盆腔淋巴结清扫术与无淋巴结清扫术:随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the report by Benedetti Panici et al. (1), results of a randomized trial on lymph-adenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer are presented. The authors appropriately acknowledge the main limitations of their study (ie, the lack of systematic para-aortic lymphadenectomy and strict criteria for adjuvant therapy), but we believe that comments related to the following three topics are necessary to avoid misinterpretation of the study: inclusion of low-risk patients, incomplete surgical procedure, and lack of standardization of postoperative treatment.
机译:在Benedetti Panici等人的报告中。 (1)提出了子宫内膜癌患者淋巴结清扫术随机试验的结果。作者适当承认他们研究的主要局限性(即缺乏系统的主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术和严格的辅助治疗标准),但我们认为,与以下三个主题相关的评论对于避免对研究的误解是必要的:低危患者,手术程序不完整以及术后治疗缺乏标准化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号