...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurophysiology >'...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli': the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity.
【24h】

'...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli': the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity.

机译:“……并被要求在忽略听觉刺激的同时阅读一本自选书”:任务要求对不匹配负性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The Mismatch Negativity (MMN) is commonly recorded while the subject is reading, and instructed to ignore the auditory stimuli. It is generally assumed that the demands of the diversion task will have no effect on the MMN. Several studies, however, have reported that a diversion task presumably requiring strong attentional focus is associated with a smaller MMN than that elicited during a less demanding task. This study examines the effect of variations in the classical reading paradigm on the MMN. METHODS: In Experiment 1, event-related potentials (ERP) were recorded while subjects were presented with standard (80 dB SPL 1000 Hz) and frequency deviant (1050 Hz) stimuli. Subjects were instructed to ignore the tone pips and, in separate conditions, engage in different tasks. They were asked to read a text or to sit passively. Subjects were informed that they would subsequently be queried or not about the content of the reading. In Experiment 2, the auditory sequence included the same standard(80 dB SPL 1000 Hz) but the deviant was changed to an intensity decrement (70 dB SPL). A different sample of subjects was again asked to ignore the auditory stimuli and engage in different reading tasks that would or not be followed by query. RESULTS: In all task conditions, MMN was elicited by the frequency and intensity change. The intensity MMN did not significantly vary with task. A significant effect of task was, however, found for the frequency MMN. Its amplitude was largest when subjects were later queried about their reading. CONCLUSIONS: This finding is counter-intuitive in light of previous research on the attentional modulation of the MMN. The pattern of frequency MMN results may relate to the differences in cortical excitability across tasks. SIGNIFICANCE: The present results indicate that the nature of the diversion task may affect the MMN. The choice of diversion task during MMN recording should thus be carefully considered.
机译:目的:失配负电(MMN)通常在受试者阅读时记录,并指示其忽略听觉刺激。通常假定转移任务的需求对MMN没有影响。然而,几项研究报告说,与需要较少的任务相比,可能需要强烈关注的转移任务与较小的MMN相关。这项研究检查了经典阅读范例中的变化对MMN的影响。方法:在实验1中,记录与事件相关的电位(ERP),同时为受试者提供标准(80 dB SPL 1000 Hz)和频率偏差(1050 Hz)刺激。指示受试者忽略语调基调,并在单独的条件下进行不同的任务。他们被要求阅读文本或被动地坐着。受试者被告知,随后将询问或不询问阅读内容。在实验2中,听觉序列包含相同的标准(80 dB SPL 1000 Hz),但偏离度改为强度递减(70 dB SPL)。再次要求不同的受试者样本忽略听觉刺激,并从事不同的阅读任务,无论该询问任务是否经过询问。结果:在所有任务条件下,MMN是由频率和强度变化引起的。 MMN的强度没有因任务而显着变化。但是,对于频率MMN,发现任务的显着效果。当后来询问受试者阅读情况时,其幅度最大。结论:鉴于先前有关MMN的注意调制的研究,这一发现是违反直觉的。 MMN频率结果的模式可能与跨任务的皮层兴奋性差异有关。意义:目前的结果表明,转移任务的性质可能会影响MMN。因此,应仔细考虑在MMN记录过程中转移任务的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号