首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurophysiology >Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates.
【24h】

Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates.

机译:拉普拉斯波形的主成分分析作为识别ERP发生器模式的通用方法:II。低密度估算的充分性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparability of high- and low-density surface Laplacian estimates for determining ERP generator patterns of group data derived from a typical ERP sample size and paradigm. METHODS: High-density ERP data (129 sites) recorded from 17 adults during tonal and phonetic oddball tasks were converted to a 10-20-system EEG montage (31 sites) using spherical spline interpolations. Current source density (CSD) waveforms were computed from the high- and low-density, but otherwise identical, ERPs, and correlated at corresponding locations. CSD data were submitted to separate covariance-based, unrestricted temporal PCAs (Varimax of covariance loadings) to identify and effectively summarize temporally and spatially overlapping CSD components. Solutions were compared by correlating factor loadings and scores, and by plotting ANOVA F statistics derived from corresponding high- and low-resolution factor scores using representative sites. RESULTS: High- and low-density CSD waveforms, PCA solutions, and F statistics were remarkably similar, yielding correlations of .9 < or = r < or = .999 between waveforms, loadings, and scores for almost all comparisons at low-density locations except for low-signal CSD waveforms at occipital sites. Each of the first 10 high-density factors corresponded precisely to one factor of the first 10 low-density factors, with each 10-factor set accounting for the meaningful CSD variance (> 91.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Low-density surface Laplacian estimates were shown to be accurate approximations of high-density CSDs at these locations, which adequately and quite sufficiently summarized group data. Moreover, reasonable approximations of many high-density scalp locations were obtained for group data from interpolations of low-density data. If group findings are the primary objective, as typical for cognitive ERP research, low-resolution CSD topographies may be as efficient, given the effective spatial smoothing when averaging across subjects and/or conditions. SIGNIFICANCE: Conservative recommendations for restricting surface Laplacians to high-density recordings may not be appropriate for all ERP research applications, and should be re-evaluated considering objective, costs and benefits.
机译:目的:评估高密度和低密度表面拉普拉斯估计值的可比性,以确定通过典型ERP样本大小和范式得出的组数据的ERP生成器模式。方法:使用球面样条插值法,将17位成年人在音调和语音奇球任务中记录的高密度ERP数据(129个位置)转换为10-20系统EEG剪辑(31个位置)。电流源密度(CSD)波形是根据高密度和低密度(但在其他方面相同)的ERP计算得出的,并在相应的位置进行了相关。将CSD数据提交到基于协方差的不受限制的临时PCA(协方差负载的方差),以识别和有效总结时空重叠的CSD分量。通过关联因子加载和得分,并通过使用代表性站点绘制从相应的高分辨率和低分辨率因子得分得出的ANOVA F统计数据,对解决方案进行了比较。结果:高密度和低密度CSD波形,PCA解决方案和F统计数据非常相似,低密度下几乎所有比较的波形,负载和得分之间的相关性均为.9 <或= r <或= .999枕骨部位的低信号CSD波形除外。前10个高密度因子中的每一个都精确对应于前10个低密度因子中的一个因子,而每10个因子集说明了有意义的CSD方差(> 91.6%)。结论:低密度表面拉普拉斯估计值被证明是这些位置上高密度CSD的精确近似值,可以充分,充分地总结组数据。此外,从低密度数据的插值中获得了组数据的许多高密度头皮位置的合理近似值。如果组发现是主要目标(如认知ERP研究的典型目标),则考虑到对各个主题和/或条件进行平均的有效空间平滑效果,低分辨率CSD地形图可能同样有效。重要性:限制地面拉普拉斯人使用高密度记录的保守建议可能并不适合所有ERP研究应用,应根据目标,成本和收益进行重新评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号